Not Another Metric Thread

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
F = 1.8xC+32 or C = (F-32)/1.8

Not sure what's hard about the above OR

KG ---> LBS = x 2.2
LBS ---> KG = /2.2

:)
The maths is easier if you use the fraction 9/5 instead of 1.8, if doing the calculations in your head.

1.6km per mile

1m = 39"
I was at primary school when the metric changeover happened. Still remember many of the conversion factors.
1 mile =1.609km (actually 1.609034)
1m = 39.37" (actually 39.3701)

Our conversion to metric did not fail.
 
Last edited:
The other thing I remember was how ridiculous the conversions got in terms of significant digits. I

still see that in news articles. innumerate reporters and editors translate a nice rounded approximation to a specific number with an extra decimal.
 
Minds me of how silly it is to convert space craft speeds mph better imo use miles per second
 
I too grew up during the failed US switchover to metric, and I think the approach was all wrong. I remember learning conversions from miles to kilometers, pounds to kilos, etc. That’s not super helpful to embracing new systems.

It’s better to develop an intuitive sense of measurements. When my wife and I did our long walk across Spain we quickly started to understand that 20km was a typical doable day, 15km was an easier day, and 25km was hard. Same thing for buying food in kilos or grams, and whether a temperature forecast was going to be comfortable, hot, or cold. That’s more useful than converting everything to familiar units.

The other thing I remember was how ridiculous the conversions got in terms of significant digits. I mostly saw it on the hiking trails in state and national parks. Someone would basically guess how long the trail was in miles, and then convert it to metric all the way down to the centimeter. The sign would say something like “Forest Loop Trail — 2 miles, 3.21869 km“. Really? That accurate? Why don’t we just call it 3km and consider it good. I don’t think all the digits after the decimal point helped anyone get past the idea that metric units were hard to understand.
It was good when Tripoli updated the safe distance rules and made them to the nearest reasonable number in the measurement system they were quoted in.
 
While my Scout troop was working on the Orienteering requirements, specifically the ones to estimate the height or width of a large object or obstacle, we had one of our Scouts (Mitchell, who towered over the rest of us at about 6 ft tall at age 13 or 14) stand next to the object. The object was then measured in Mitchells and then converted into more conventional Imperial units.

The Navy also identified Osama bin Laden’s remains partially by having a SEAL of known height lie down next to his body, for comparison with bin Laden’s known measurements. President Obama later quipped “We sacrificed a helicopter for this mission, could we not afford a tape measure?”
 
$1,000,000 in $1 bills (laid flat) would stack just a few feet short of the height of the Saturn V/Apollo moon rocket, 358' 4" vs. 363' and a bit.

In the same terms, $1 bills, the US National Debt at the end of 2022 would go to the moon almost 9 times.

Put the other way, the US National Debt of $31.42 trillion in $1 bills would be the height of 30,612,427 Saturn V's.
 
How big is a Carlos relative to a Smoot?

And in the "You learn something new every day" department, it wasn't until I read that Wikipedia page again that I learned that Smoot was a chair ANSI and president of ISO. Not bad for someone who is a unitary namesake.

[edit] See this, is what happens when you don't read Page 2 before posting. Someone else has made the joke already.
 
Speaking of "metric", I had a flashback today. Who remembers when tires were designated in letter sizes?
 
Of course American drill sizes are *still* designated in arbitrary letters and numbers, in addition to fractional inch sizes. But in some fortuitous accident, every Huot drill index has the decimal inch equivalents permanently embossed into the racks. Can't imagine why...
 
Of course American drill sizes are *still* designated in arbitrary letters and numbers, in addition to fractional inch sizes. But in some fortuitous accident, every Huot drill index has the decimal inch equivalents permanently embossed into the racks. Can't imagine why...

actually, letter and number drills are rational, and match SAE tap sizes, among other things. take a look at the fractions in sequence.
 
actually, letter and number drills are rational, and match SAE tap sizes, among other things. take a look at the fractions in sequence.
True they do go in sequence but the match against tap sizes is somewhat rough, and are really bad matches for the forming taps that are now used a lot for CNC operations. After running into some unexpected trouble with the listings in some well known tap drill charts, I used a precise thread calculator to compute my own charts and found some surprising anomalies. For certain less common threads you have to resort to a metric drill to get a proper %-of-thread size.
 
Back
Top