Artemis 1 Timeline

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
From my totally non-expert understanding of the engineering is that pre-launch they run some fluid through the engine to get the engine parts near fluid temperature so the material isn't "shocked" by the sudden flood of subzero liquid upon engine start for launch.
Precisely correct. We have to do the same thing with Antares.

That said, I will be shocked if this thing actually launches today.
 
All the birds that keep flying in front of the camera. I can’t help but think about how surprised they’ll be when they hear those engines fire up!

Assuming that happens today…
 
Hey Antares JS, side note for ya: What determines which engines require chilldown? Do *all* liquid fuel engines above a certain size have it?
 
Turn the volume down, you don’t want to shatter your eardrums when the communications director speaks. There is no running commentary, only periodic announcements.
 
The Everyday Astronaut live Youtube feed has constant commentary...that's what I'm tuning into right now.
 
Watching the live feed, but it's just video, no audio. Am I doing something wrong? All volume controls are on/unmute
That feed is working for me because I can have the usual radio morning show playing and turn it down when commentator updates; thereby I get both things I want.
 
Well, the NET time we had yesterday has come and gone. Hopefully they get the countdown clock moving in the next 50 minutes, my rudimentary calculations indicate that’s the must-scrub time otherwise.
 
One of the channels I was flipping through said that there was some kind of frost issue that might need to be addressed as well. Something about determining whether the unexpected frost on the tank exterior extended to the interior.
 
Given the cost of the program thus far, I would think that the cost of an additional WDR would be lost in the noise. As it turns out, we paid for one anyway.
 
Something about determining whether the unexpected frost on the tank exterior extended to the interior.
Yikes. If there is frost forming inside a tank, that means there was moisture still inside it. If whatever system they are using to purge atmosphere and/or moisture from the tanks isn't working right, that's a huge issue.
 
Yikes. If there is frost forming inside a tank, that means there was moisture still inside it. If whatever system they are using to purge atmosphere and/or moisture from the tanks isn't working right, that's a huge issue.
The commentator on the NASA live feed mentioned that engineers looked at it and determined that it was frost forming in a crack in the insulation due to ambient air, not an internal structural leak. Apparently that was a recurring problem on shuttle flights as well.
 
The commentator on the NASA live feed mentioned that engineers looked at it and determined that it was frost forming in a crack in the insulation due to ambient air, not an internal structural leak. Apparently that was a recurring problem on shuttle flights as well.
One thing I would genuinely like to know is why they are bothering with the foam in the first place. On the shuttle it made sense because you couldn't have that ice hitting the orbiter, but now that we are back to in-line rockets, is it really necessary? Classic space rockets did fine just shaking the ice off at liftoff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top