Jeff L's unbaked design thread

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
And I assume there's a through hole for a launch lug attached to that sleeve over the motor tube?

What's the static margin? It looks pretty small from the picture. Marginal might be OK in this case, since (I think) there'll be basically no body lift.

The body is two hollow hemispheres; where do you get them? 3D print? Cut a ball in half? Or does someone sell a plastic hemisphere nose cone?

Do you mind if - ahem - someone else builds one?
 
And I assume there's a through hole for a launch lug attached to that sleeve over the motor tube?

What's the static margin? It looks pretty small from the picture. Marginal might be OK in this case, since (I think) there'll be basically no body lift.

The body is two hollow hemispheres; where do you get them? 3D print? Cut a ball in half? Or does someone sell a plastic hemisphere nose cone?

Do you mind if - ahem - someone else builds one?
Craft store sells hollow split foam spheres.
 
And I assume there's a through hole for a launch lug attached to that sleeve over the motor tube?

What's the static margin? It looks pretty small from the picture. Marginal might be OK in this case, since (I think) there'll be basically no body lift.

The body is two hollow hemispheres; where do you get them? 3D print? Cut a ball in half? Or does someone sell a plastic hemisphere nose cone?

Do you mind if - ahem - someone else builds one?
Oh, right. Rockets need launch lugs. Through hole in the sphere is probably the only sensible option here, but it will make lining up the sphere halves when prepping for flight annoying.

Stability margin should be better than OpenRocket predicts -- spheres are actually neutrally stable (CP right in the center) but OpenRocket predicts they're unstable with a CP of +infinity.

I'm thinking the parts come from scrounging at craft stores, etc. Either skim coat a foam sphere or find a plastic one designed as a Christmas ornament or terrarium shell or something. 3D printing is always an option, I guess.

I encourage anyone to build this, with or without Harry Potter Snitch livery (consider adding feather details to the fins for more Snitch styling).
 
If the lug extends the full length but is attached only to one half then it also serves as an alignment guide. But then one would have to somehow make the recovery rigging assure that the lug lands up. Also, a piece of dowel or rod could be the alignment guide, placed in the lug for prepping and then removed.
 
Oh, right. Rockets need launch lugs. Through hole in the sphere is probably the only sensible option here, but it will make lining up the sphere halves when prepping for flight annoying.

Stability margin should be better than OpenRocket predicts -- spheres are actually neutrally stable (CP right in the center) but OpenRocket predicts they're unstable with a CP of +infinity.

I'm thinking the parts come from scrounging at craft stores, etc. Either skim coat a foam sphere or find a plastic one designed as a Christmas ornament or terrarium shell or something. 3D printing is always an option, I guess.

I encourage anyone to build this, with or without Harry Potter Snitch livery (consider adding feather details to the fins for more Snitch styling).

If you can line up and build in a tube (like a soda straw) between the two holes for the rod, it really helps in getting the rod through both ends of the lug.

Worked well here.

69E5B6E0-A0B1-4052-82C5-C7C7347AFB0D.jpeg
 
Can the booster stage of a two stage rocket do glide recovery?
An empty motor casing has about the right center of gravity to make a canard glider out of, so I think something like this would work:

Screen Shot 2020-12-17 at 6.31.00 PM.png

The booster alone looks like this, a kind of stubby little airplane. Hopefully it can be trimmed for glide by making small adjustments to the canard wings which won't mess with the full stack too much on ascent.
Screen Shot 2020-12-17 at 6.30.39 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • booster_glider.ork
    2.2 KB · Views: 6
Can the booster stage of a two stage rocket do glide recovery?
I have witnessed it, so the answer is "yes". Of course, the time I saw it, it was unintentional: the booster of an Estes Extreme 12 got into a stable glide and went whizzing right past my head. I feel certain that I was the only one who witnessed it.

I don't know how hard it is to *intentionally* get one into a glide, particularly if it's a short stubby booster. I can more easily imagine a gap-staged booster really being designed to be a proper glider.
 
I started playing with booster gliders when I ran across this early shuttle concept:
star_clipper.jpg


The drop tank is in the front, which seems like it can solve some stability problems. So since then I've been thinking about space planes with stuff forward of the plane in the stack. I think it would be cool to have a real heavy-lift rocket something like this:
Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 10.40.03 AM.png
There's a single use fuel tank and some optional payload space in the front, an orbiter with payload and some fuel, and a first stage with glide recovery and vertical landing stap-on boosters. Figure 30 tonnes up to LEO, up to 10 tonnes of return cargo back down, the forward tank can stay attached to the orbiter for the entire mission until just before reentry if you want extra consumables during the mission. Easy-peasy, cheap access to space for everyone in cool looking rocket planes!
What could possibly go wrong?

Or at least tell that as a story and build a fatasy-scale model of it...
 
Can the booster stage of a two stage rocket do glide recovery?
An empty motor casing has about the right center of gravity to make a canard glider out of, so I think something like this would work:

View attachment 442830

The booster alone looks like this, a kind of stubby little airplane. Hopefully it can be trimmed for glide by making small adjustments to the canard wings which won't mess with the full stack too much on ascent.
View attachment 442829
It has been a goal of mine.

Estes had the black widow and I think centuri hsd tiger shark (may have been same design.) I cloned the tiger shark, couldn't get the booster to glide worth beans.

Edmonds had CiCi2, I did a recent clone, lost the sustainer on first flight, and booster glided into a post and snapped the fuse.

Definitely doable, but I think have a shifting elevator or canard would make booster more likely to glide

Good luck, and post results!
 
In some slightly different world, there was probably a TV show or a movie or something where the writers were really unclear about whether the flying things were supposed to be rockets or jet planes, and the dialog was terrible, and it was all totally ridiculous but also somehow really awesome, and there was a starfighter in it that looks something like this.starfighter.pngstarfighter_side.pngstarfighter_back.png
 

Attachments

  • starfighter.ork
    2.3 KB · Views: 5
More silly Star Trek stuff. Playing around with trying to make something that looks like an actual Trek starship, but still has some chance of being stable. This one needs to cram about 30 grams of weight into the front of the saucer section to fly.

Pylon2.pngScreen Shot 2021-05-08 at 10.38.01 AM.pngScreen Shot 2021-05-08 at 10.38.36 AM.png
 
That's cool... but it will weather cock like crazy.

No wind... dead calm is your friend on this one.

Might want to put some adhesive foil inside rectangular box to prevent charring?

You know it might fly as a tractor motor design without the nose weight,,, especially with how draggy the design is in the rear. @Daddyisabar ... your thoughts?
 
I've been mulling some over as well, and my problem is always that the saucer constitutes a giant pair of canards, and we have only the warp nacelles for fins. It seems very challenging.
 
You know those six vents or whatever on the top aft of the Millennium Falcon? I'd bet if you punched clear tubes all the way through so they stuck out both sides you could get enough drag.
 

Attachments

  • gdykstraFalcon005.jpg
    gdykstraFalcon005.jpg
    154.6 KB · Views: 9
A BT-60 based semiscale model of Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo looks not too hard, just cutting and gluing some funny shaped balsa fins:
View attachment 465554
Looks very cool. I see a potential concern that the fins are so far off to one side. @BABAR likes to say "Symmetry is overrated" and he has lots of successful designs to prove it. I wonder if there any tricks to doing this sort of thing successfully that he might like to pass along.
 
Looks very cool. I see a potential concern that the fins are so far off to one side. @BABAR likes to say "Symmetry is overrated" and he has lots of successful designs to prove it. I wonder if there any tricks to doing this sort of thing successfully that he might like to pass along.
Yeah, that is *very* asymmetrical, I foresee difficulties in getting it to fly straight. But who knows!
 
Back
Top