Fin Vacuum Bagging Process by rharshberger

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rharshberger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
12,736
Reaction score
4,733
Location
Pasco, WA
This is the process I use to vacuum bag my MPR and HPR fins. The fins used here are for a SBR/Fusion Rockets 4" Thor and have a layer of 7oz fiberglass (RAKA Inc iirc), and a layer of 3K 5.8oz Carbon Twill from Soller Composites, since this rocket will not be a high performance rocket the twill fabrics were used without orienting the weaves to increase rigidity.

My foundation is a piece of 1/2" particle board covered with Dura-Lar (Dur-Lar?) drafting film from Hobby Lobby secured around the edges by blue painters tape. The particle board was chosen for two reasons, its easy to machine and its rigid but porous so it acts as a breather for the bagging process as well a the breather cloth does. The board was given a 1/8" radius on ALL edges to prevent puncturing the bag as much as possible. Another reason for the board is its easier to assemble the laminate on top then slide the whole unit into the bag.
FinVacBagProcess 1.jpg
The fins had already had one side done so I covered the reverse side with green painters tape then packing tape around the edges, excess was cut off flush with the edge. A loop of green painters tape is stuck to the back of each fin to hold it to the board during the wetting out process.
FinVacBagProcess 2.jpg
Fins laid out on board prior to wetting out, its important to make sure everything fits and is aligned the way you want before mixing epoxy.
FinVacBagProcess 3.jpg
The start of my mise en place, all of my materials are pre-cut and ready to go before I start I will reverse the order they are currently shown in the picture. Breather (white fabric) which is 1/4" thick cotton quilt batting from JoAnns Fabrics, the Blue fabric is nylon peel ply from ACP Composites, black cloth is the Soller 5.8oz Carbon Twill, and the barely visible stuff under the carbon is the 7oz fiberglass from Raka Inc. One trick to cutting Carbon Fiber I have found and seen has been to lay out the fabric and get the weave the way I want it (as straight as possible), I then use 1/4" masking tape to tape the outer edge of the area I plan to use, then I cut along the center of the tape with a rolling fabric cutter (Olfa and Fiskars are two common brands). The rolling cutter works well on Carbon and Fiberglass but sucks on aramids like kevlar and nomex. Make sure all the layers are larger than the area you need to cover as its easier to remove excess than to try and wiggle the layers around to cover missed spots.
FinVacBagProcess 4.jpg
I use Harbor Freight chip brushes for applying the epoxy, the bristles are normally pretty scraggly so I cut them off to about 1" long or so to even them up, it also seems to help stop the brush from shedding bristles as bad. The brush will still shed a few bristles usually during the first layer application so they are easy to spot and pick out.
FinVacBagProcess 5.jpg
Epoxy measured and ready to go (this was actually the second batch and is about half the size of the first batch I made. Epoxy is US Composites 635 Laminating Epoxy 3:1 ratio, I love the stuff, its easy to get good results with and its pretty forgiving.
FinVacBagProcess 6.jpg
Layer of fiberglass applied and then checked for proper wet out, properly wetted out FG cloth is usually clear (you can see the wood grain in this case through it), using extra epoxy at this stage is okay, its better to have excess than not enough as the next layer will pick up most of the extra.
FinVacBagProcess 7.jpg
Layer of carbon fiber applied, notice that the upper left corner section is still dry, its harder to tell when carbon is adequately wetted out unless you see excess standing on the surface, I use a tap tap motion with the brush bristle tips or a patting motion with the flat of the brush to work the excess epoxy from below up through the layer. I have found its easier for me to work epoxy from below than it is to get epoxy to pentrate the layers from above.
FinVacBagProcess 8.jpg
Carbon Fully wetted out and excess epoxy standing on surface.
FinVacBagProcess 9.jpg
Peel ply layer applied, at this point I actually had to make a bit more epoxy as I find the excess lubricates the peel ply and makes it easier to work around. All the large air bubbles are removed at this point leaving some really tiny ones. I like to see the peel ply fully wetted out with NO dry spots.
FinVacBagProcess 10.jpg
 
Does this process lend itself to much cleanup/sanding after to smooth and flatten? Or is the end product rather flat after vacuum bagging?
 
and continued on:

The breather material applied on top the peel ply, the breather does two things A) it lets the air move out of the bag as the vacuum is pulled, its entirely possible to pull a vacuum on most of the bag but some area have a trapped air bubble once a section of bag has sealed off and B) it absorbs the excess epoxy without it running toward your vacuum pump or fitting. The breather here is cotton quilt batting from JoAnns fabric, I like it and its cheap and easy to get (and my wife saves her scraps for me).
FinVacBagProcess 11.jpg
The whole enchilada in the bag, I like to do this before any of the wet stuff gets to the surface of the breather its so much easier. The bag is a nylon tube material from ACP Composite and uses a channel and rod at each end to close it. The bag fitting is the cheap one from ACP Composites as well, but here its covered up by some clay to seal a small leak, this seems to be where most of my bags leak is at the fitting.
FinVacBagProcess 12.jpg
Vacuum pump has been started, at this point I am looking for creases in the wrong places, if I find one simply release the vacuum, smooth and reapply vacuum.
FinVacBagProcess 13.jpg
Vacuum pulled, notice the difference between the three pictures as the excess epoxy is soaked up by the breather material.
FinVacBagProcess 14.jpg
This picture was taken after 8 minutes under vacuum and the gauge was showing 28.5"Hg, once the pump is fully warmed up it will pull 30"Hg, for vacuum bagging 18-20"Hg is plenty.
FinVacBagProcess 15.jpg
My favorite Epoxy US Composites 635 3:1
FinVacBagProcess 16.jpg
Just a picture of the peel ply and breather post cure (from yesterdays process on the other side of the fins). The breather compresses down to about 1/16" thick and the peel ply easily separates from both the breather and the carbon. I tried polyester cloth from the fabric store ONE TIME, it worked but it was a bee-otch to get off the laminate, real peel ply's are coated most likely with silicone.

FinVacBagProcess 17.jpg

After about 4-5 hours under vacuum the fins can be removed once they reach the green or leather stage, its easier to trim off the excess while its still leather like. My usual test to see if they are ready is to check to see if the leftover epoxy has reached a non-tacky but flexible state.
 
Last edited:
Does this process lend itself to much cleanup/sanding after to smooth and flatten? Or is the end product rather flat after vacuum bagging?
Then end product will need the edges cleaned up and the layup will look like this, the surface will need a coat of epoxy before any sanding can be done on it if desired, however it should be very flat. These fins will get the edges cleaned up on a belt sander then both sides will get a coat of epoxy, as the fins will not be painted (not all the way anyways) and I want the look of the carbon to show through. If you want the fin edges beveled its best to do it before laminating. These fins have the leading edge of the forward fin beveled and the trailing edge of the aft fin beveled.



20200430_132846[1].jpg
 
Thanks for sharing, Rich!

So, you just paint a layer of US Composites 635 on each side (one at a time) once the vacuum-bagged fins are cured? Is this extra epoxy layer only required for carbon fiber?

From videos on glassing a cardboard tube (tfish38 and J Coker) or laying up a fiberglass tube on a mandrel (tfish38), it seems like the peel ply leaves behind a nearly smooth surface. But the carbon fiber twill fabric has a rougher texture?

Sigh, you've got me looking at CF on Soller Composites web site now and I haven't even glassed my first tube yet. ;)
 
Thanks for sharing, Rich!

So, you just paint a layer of US Composites 635 on each side (one at a time) once the vacuum-bagged fins are cured? Is this extra epoxy layer only required for carbon fiber?

From videos on glassing a cardboard tube (tfish38 and J Coker) or laying up a fiberglass tube on a mandrel (tfish38), it seems like the peel ply leaves behind a nearly smooth surface. But the carbon fiber twill fabric has a rougher texture?

Sigh, you've got me looking at CF on Soller Composites web site now and I haven't even glassed my first tube yet. ;)
Pretty much, the peel ply does leave a sandpaper like surface albeit very fine,but it also pulls the excess epoxy off the surface. If I were to sand right now I would be sanding almost immediately into the carbon (bad). Now that the fins are laminated I will clean up the edges a give them a coat of epoxy, the new coat once cured can be sanded if the surface is not smooth enough. John and Tony's method with mylar I have never gotten to work well (for me) as it left lots of air pockets so I ended up sanding down the tubes a lot then filling and painting what was left.
 
Pretty much, the peel ply does leave a sandpaper like surface albeit very fine,but it also pulls the excess epoxy off the surface. If I were to sand right now I would be sanding almost immediately into the carbon (bad). Now that the fins are laminated I will clean up the edges a give them a coat of epoxy, the new coat once cured can be sanded if the surface is not smooth enough. John and Tony's method with mylar I have never gotten to work well (for me) as it left lots of air pockets so I ended up sanding down the tubes a lot then filling and painting what was left.

The only place I use mylar is for a tube mandrel release. I've tried mylar on top of layups.. off video... for an ultra smooth surface without any luck...lots of air pockets.
 
The only place I use mylar is for a tube mandrel release. I've tried mylar on top of layups.. off video... for an ultra smooth surface without any luck...lots of air pockets.
Thanks for that clarification Tony, yours and Johns videos are what got me started.
 
Okay, here are the fins after the peel ply and breather are removed, and the edges have been sanded to remove excess epoxy. Then the fins after a coat of laminating epoxy is brushed on. After the epoxy is applied a heat gun is used to warm the epoxy (but not to bubbling or smoking temp) so it fows out nice and smooth and almost all the tiny air bubbles are removed, the smallest air bubbles when clustered together kind of look like a milky color but the hwat gun takes care of that. Make sure ther is no dust or undesired stuff on the surface before applying epoxy, I wiped the fins down with denatured alcohol then right before coating hit them with a tack cloth.

Once both sides of the fin have been coated they will be block sanded to smooth out the little high spots (which look like dust in the glossy pick below, then wet sanded, and re-coated, making sure not to sand through the epoxy into the carbon below. It may take another wet sanding and coating to get it to the level I want, these fins will be mostly painted like the gif below, the only unpainted area of the rocket will be the black areas, everything else gets paint. Masking should be a bit fun, but I have done harder.







20200501_205414.jpg20200501_205444.jpgSBR Thor.gif
 
Last edited:
Both sides have been coated like the center picture in the above post, after that both sides were wet sanded with a wood block and 400grit sandpaper (didn't have any 300 or 220 grit wet/dry) to knock off the high spots in prep for another coating. Each of the triangular fins are about 74 grams +/-1 gram and the clipped delta shaped ones are 84 grams +/-1 gram. Normally if I think there is enough epoxy on the surface of the fin I will block sand all the way until the sheen is dull all over telling me that all the highs now match the lowes (low spots are shiny after blocking), however in this case I'm not sure so I stopped at about 75% or wherever I felt comfortable not sanding into the reinforcement. Another layer of epoxy will allow the leveling to be completed. I will let these dry for a few hours in the shop and then add another coat of epoxy.

FinVacBagProcess 18.jpg
 
Thanks again for sharing your process! I finally did my first experiment today with glassing fins of different materials (1/8" balsa, 1/8" aircraft ply, and 3D printed PLA). I tried to use a single layer of 6 oz and to do both sides of 3 fins with a single sheet of FG per side.

After finishing the first side with FG, peel ply, and batting on a mylar-wrapped 3/4" plywood board, I tried to flip it over to do the other side. However, the two wood fins stuck to the mylar and I had to push them back into place. I cleaned off the mylar and proceeded with side #2, figuring that this might be a disaster but I'd see. The second side went smoothly, masking tape held everything against the board, and it went into the FoodSaver bag for about 6 hours.

After peeling, the surface is definitely NOT like what I had when I peeled the ply off my first tubes per Tony's video. Those tubes took a few minutes of sanding to be smooth (other than some defects -- first time). As you noted above, if I sand these fins I'll pretty much immediately cut into the weave, so they probably need an epoxy coat. The fins are MUCH stiffer than unreinforced (esp. the balsa) and haven't gained nearly as much weight as I expected, so overall the experiment is promising. For example, my balsa fin went from 3.1g to about 6g, where I expected an 8-9g weight gain.

So is your "laminating epoxy" just another batch of US Composites 635? That's what I'm using as well, based on TRF comments from people like you more than likely!

Am I crazy to consider laminating 1/8" balsa for a BT-80 that flies on F thru J motors (including supersonic)? I am planning tip-to-tip glass as well, but I'm torn between balsa and plywood for the core. Maybe two layers of 6 oz instead of one? Or CF for one of the layers (Soller Composites was tempting, but shipping is steep for a "small" order so I haven't ordered yet).

Advice is much appreciated -- loving where my experiments are heading, and my daughter is paying close attention for ideas for her TARC team. I've learned obvious lessons like maybe doing one side at a time, making 100% certain the fins are cleaned with denatured alcohol before laminating, and maybe taking the fins out of the bag (and trimming) at about 4 hours instead of 6 (I use 635 w/ 4:1, but at around 65 deg F ambient temp).
 
Thanks again for sharing your process! I finally did my first experiment today with glassing fins of different materials (1/8" balsa, 1/8" aircraft ply, and 3D printed PLA). I tried to use a single layer of 6 oz and to do both sides of 3 fins with a single sheet of FG per side.

After finishing the first side with FG, peel ply, and batting on a mylar-wrapped 3/4" plywood board, I tried to flip it over to do the other side. However, the two wood fins stuck to the mylar and I had to push them back into place. I cleaned off the mylar and proceeded with side #2, figuring that this might be a disaster but I'd see. The second side went smoothly, masking tape held everything against the board, and it went into the FoodSaver bag for about 6 hours.

After peeling, the surface is definitely NOT like what I had when I peeled the ply off my first tubes per Tony's video. Those tubes took a few minutes of sanding to be smooth (other than some defects -- first time). As you noted above, if I sand these fins I'll pretty much immediately cut into the weave, so they probably need an epoxy coat. The fins are MUCH stiffer than unreinforced (esp. the balsa) and haven't gained nearly as much weight as I expected, so overall the experiment is promising. For example, my balsa fin went from 3.1g to about 6g, where I expected an 8-9g weight gain.

So is your "laminating epoxy" just another batch of US Composites 635? That's what I'm using as well, based on TRF comments from people like you more than likely!

Am I crazy to consider laminating 1/8" balsa for a BT-80 that flies on F thru J motors (including supersonic)? I am planning tip-to-tip glass as well, but I'm torn between balsa and plywood for the core. Maybe two layers of 6 oz instead of one? Or CF for one of the layers (Soller Composites was tempting, but shipping is steep for a "small" order so I haven't ordered yet).

Advice is much appreciated -- loving where my experiments are heading, and my daughter is paying close attention for ideas for her TARC team. I've learned obvious lessons like maybe doing one side at a time, making 100% certain the fins are cleaned with denatured alcohol before laminating, and maybe taking the fins out of the bag (and trimming) at about 4 hours instead of 6 (I use 635 w/ 4:1, but at around 65 deg F ambient temp).
My laminating epoxy of choice is rarely anything other than US Composites 635, now that I feel I am getting my process down quick enough I may go to a quicker hardener but same 635 family. I usually only do one side of the fin at a time, especially with carbon as its opaque and make trimming the excess while its green/leather stage a bit harder to do as you cant see the underlying layer which is not an issue with FG.

Vacuum baggings purpose is to A) compress the layers as tightly as possible and B) to remove the excess epoxy down to as close to ideal ratio as possible, hence very little is left on top the weave, but dry is not good either.

As for laminating a balsa fin for F to J flight experience will tell the truth, usually if I am laminating regular balsa fins its for low and midpower maybe H motors and its will .5oz to 2oz FG, I have seen papered balsa fins flown on L1 cert flights, and the rocket survived just fine, not sure what the "speed of balsa" is but fin planform has a lot to do with how much it can flutter without self destructing. Normally when I am laminating balsa for HPR its endgrain balsa core material or foams made for laminating, end grain balsa is superior to parallel to lamination grain balsa as the fibers are in tension, when parallel its easy to peel the laminate apart right along the surface of the sandwich layers, end grain good luck. I would personally use plywood for HPR applications.

One trick for know when to pull the fins from the bag and trim the excess when its at leather stage is to us a popsicle stick dipped in the epoxy (I use the one I mixed the epoxy with), when the epoxy on it has cured to the point I can touch it and it not feel tacky, then the fins are carefully removed and trimmed making sure to use a sharp razor blade and that the laminate is not peeled off the substrate/core material.

Two layers of 6ozs is okay, my example fins above used a 7oz FG and a 6oz CF iirc.
 
Pretty much, the peel ply does leave a sandpaper like surface albeit very fine,but it also pulls the excess epoxy off the surface. If I were to sand right now I would be sanding almost immediately into the carbon (bad). Now that the fins are laminated I will clean up the edges a give them a coat of epoxy, the new coat once cured can be sanded if the surface is not smooth enough. John and Tony's method with mylar I have never gotten to work well (for me) as it left lots of air pockets so I ended up sanding down the tubes a lot then filling and painting what was left.
it's been a while since i was looking into this but iirc you can use a layer of perforated teflon under the peel ply to get a smooth finish. The excess epoxy still moves through the perforations and into the peel ply but the teflon is very fine and leaves a smoother texture when it comes off.
 
it's been a while since i was looking into this but iirc you can use a layer of perforated teflon under the peel ply to get a smooth finish. The excess epoxy still moves through the perforations and into the peel ply but the teflon is very fine and leaves a smoother texture when it comes off.
Its not really a problem with peel ply, a single coat of epoxy over the top of the "texture" and its clear again, I have some perforated teflon and its fine for flat surfaces IMO but once surfaces start getting compound curves/bumps/swells etc, then the issue becomes preventing wrinkles as the vacuum is pulled since you can't see through the breather, with nylon or polyester fabric peel ply's this is not an issue usually.
 
it's been a while since i was looking into this but iirc you can use a layer of perforated teflon under the peel ply to get a smooth finish. The excess epoxy still moves through the perforations and into the peel ply but the teflon is very fine and leaves a smoother texture when it comes off.

The other issue with the perforated peel ply is that it leaves little nibs everywhere there was a perforation. Which then need to be sanded off. Which puts you back to square one.
 
Very nice job; thanks for sharing.

I also prefer a porous release to remove the excess epoxy and produce a lighter and more consistent part. I haven't tried clear-coating with a layer of laminating epoxy yet, but yours looks good.

Note that there are various types of release. I prefer the cloth-like material to the plastic sheet with holes punched in it. The latter is tedious to remove as it comes off in small pieces that you have to "pick off" (like taking off a sticker).

For those who haven't done this yet, here's a diagram to show the different layers we're talking about:

Bagging Layers.png
 
Very nice job; thanks for sharing.

I also prefer a porous release to remove the excess epoxy and produce a lighter and more consistent part. I haven't tried clear-coating with a layer of laminating epoxy yet, but yours looks good.

Note that there are various types of release. I prefer the cloth-like material to the plastic sheet with holes punched in it. The latter is tedious to remove as it comes off in small pieces that you have to "pick off" (like taking off a sticker).

For those who haven't done this yet, here's a diagram to show the different layers we're talking about:

View attachment 419274
Thanks for the kind words John, you,Jim Jarvis, and tfish are the ones who really got me started in this process. Thanks for that diagram its simple but shows the "stack" in an easy to understand format. I grew up around FG and cultured marble since my Dad for 8-10 years had a cultured marble and custom fiberglass bathtub and shower business (though the processes are quite different than our uses).
 
My laminating epoxy of choice is rarely anything other than US Composites 635, now that I feel I am getting my process down quick enough I may go to a quicker hardener but same 635 family. I usually only do one side of the fin at a time, especially with carbon as its opaque and make trimming the excess while its green/leather stage a bit harder to do as you cant see the underlying layer which is not an issue with FG.

Vacuum baggings purpose is to A) compress the layers as tightly as possible and B) to remove the excess epoxy down to as close to ideal ratio as possible, hence very little is left on top the weave, but dry is not good either.

As for laminating a balsa fin for F to J flight experience will tell the truth, usually if I am laminating regular balsa fins its for low and midpower maybe H motors and its will .5oz to 2oz FG, I have seen papered balsa fins flown on L1 cert flights, and the rocket survived just fine, not sure what the "speed of balsa" is but fin planform has a lot to do with how much it can flutter without self destructing. Normally when I am laminating balsa for HPR its endgrain balsa core material or foams made for laminating, end grain balsa is superior to parallel to lamination grain balsa as the fibers are in tension, when parallel its easy to peel the laminate apart right along the surface of the sandwich layers, end grain good luck. I would personally use plywood for HPR applications.

One trick for know when to pull the fins from the bag and trim the excess when its at leather stage is to us a popsicle stick dipped in the epoxy (I use the one I mixed the epoxy with), when the epoxy on it has cured to the point I can touch it and it not feel tacky, then the fins are carefully removed and trimmed making sure to use a sharp razor blade and that the laminate is not peeled off the substrate/core material.

Two layers of 6ozs is okay, my example fins above used a 7oz FG and a 6oz CF iirc.

I tried this last night (no vacuum though) with some basswood fins. I forgot how much the basswood soaks up epoxy, I was thinking of putting a layer of sanding sealer over the basswood before starting the process. Do you think sanding sealer would screw up the bond?
 
I tried this last night (no vacuum though) with some basswood fins. I forgot how much the basswood soaks up epoxy, I was thinking of putting a layer of sanding sealer over the basswood before starting the process. Do you think sanding sealer would screw up the bond?
IMO yes, the reinforcement material would only bond on the surface, part of the strength comes from the epoxy penetrating the core material. How much it will affect the structure I dont know.
 
With (FoodSaver) vacuum bagging (a la John Coker), I only saw a roughly 4g increase on some BT-80-sized Patriot fins. Starting weights were 3.1g (1/8" balsa) and 9.1g (1/8" baltic birch ply). So, at least with vacuum bagging, I didn't see a dramatic weight gain for a huge gain in strength.
 
Last edited:
I also prefer a porous release to remove the excess epoxy and produce a lighter and more consistent part. I haven't tried clear-coating with a layer of laminating epoxy yet, but yours looks good.

Note that there are various types of release. I prefer the cloth-like material to the plastic sheet with holes punched in it. The latter is tedious to remove as it comes off in small pieces that you have to "pick off" (like taking off a sticker).

For those who haven't done this yet, here's a diagram to show the different layers we're talking about:

View attachment 419274

On wet layouts, I do both. Among other reasons, that's because I was always under the impression that this is the orthodox way.
The peel ply controls the surface texture of the part and is also a good indicator if there are dry spots. The perforated film on top of the peel ply is only a separation aid. If there is too much resin in the layup, the saturated breather can become quite rigid and hard to remove from the peel ply if there is no film.

Reinhard
 
On wet layouts, I do both. Among other reasons, that's because I was always under the impression that this is the orthodox way.
The peel ply controls the surface texture of the part and is also a good indicator if there are dry spots. The perforated film on top of the peel ply is only a separation aid. If there is too much resin in the layup, the saturated breather can become quite rigid and hard to remove from the peel ply if there is no film.

Reinhard
Usually the peel ply and breather material are removed in one piece, complex and fragile parts may require removal in individual layers, but it would be hard to say what those situations would be. Using perforated film between the peel ply and the breather is neither right nor wrong afaik its not usually done that way, as both peel ply and perforated films are designed to be easily removeable and to control the surface texture on the part. Resin infusion may be quite different in how it works and I am not familiar (experienced) with that technique.
 
I forget who i read it from, but i recall a post discussing a con of peel ply being micro cracks at the surface when its pulled off. Potentially leaving stress concentrations that the final wipe of epoxy might not fill completely
 
I was on 3M's website this morning and ran across one of their spray adhesive that is designed to work with epoxies, fiberglass cloth and CF cloth. It is used for adhering different layers of cloth before vacuum bagging. It seems to me that this would help with projects like this or making a tube.

https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company...pray-Adhesive-71/?N=5002385+3290539321&rt=rud
Actually, iirc someone has used a spray adhesive on a tube when wrapping them with FG (or it might have been on the mylar wrapped around the mandrel to attach the end of the fabric to the mylar). As for fins its never been an issue for me.
 
Actually, iirc someone has used a spray adhesive on a tube when wrapping them with FG (or it might have been on the mylar wrapped around the mandrel to attach the end of the fabric to the mylar). As for fins its never been an issue for me.

Unsure of spray adhesives , but I do recall @mccordmw used a spray adhesion promoter for glassing Yellow concrete form tubes.
 
I prefer not use use any adhesive other than the epoxy for fear of possible contamination issues resulting in cure anomalies.
 
I prefer not use use any adhesive other than the epoxy for fear of possible contamination issues resulting in cure anomalies.

Those were my exact thoughts when I was looking at the 3M product. It says its 30% stronger than layups with other spray adhsives and that wasn't exactly confidence inspiring. I understand the use for the complicated mold surface layups in industry, but for rockets with their simple geometry, we've got a bunch of techniques and methods to get things stuck where we want them.

Although I wonder if the adhesive would help keep the fiber from shifting under perf-release film or mylar. I've heard folks say the fabric moves around worse than when using peel-ply
 
Back
Top