Thrustcurve shows slightly higher total impulse for the C5 (9.1 vs. 8.8 N-s), slightly shorter burn time (1.7s vs. 1.9s), slightly higher average thrust (5.3 N vs. 4.7 N), and significantly higher max thrust (21.9 N vs. 14.1 N). Yeah, I'm too lazy to create a table.
So basically, it's stronger than the C6 in all regards, with only slightly shorter burn (assuming the Thrustcurve data tells an accurate tale). I would probably use it instead of C6's in all my larger/heavier 18mm rockets, since I would *always* like to get more speed off the pad to reduce weathercocking.
Does anyone know why the C5 was discontinued instead of the C6 in the first place?
So basically, it's stronger than the C6 in all regards, with only slightly shorter burn (assuming the Thrustcurve data tells an accurate tale). I would probably use it instead of C6's in all my larger/heavier 18mm rockets, since I would *always* like to get more speed off the pad to reduce weathercocking.
Does anyone know why the C5 was discontinued instead of the C6 in the first place?