Time sensitive advice from the 900 mhz experts.

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

School of Rock'et'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
62
Reaction score
19
Location
Midland, MI
Hey all!

LDRS in 12-13 days. No access to the nosecone. (Apoxee clay sealed, wish I would have thought of this ahead of time.). 4'' diameter DD 6ft madcow fiberglass Level-2. No ham radio cert. No soldering skills or soldering station. Would like to be south of $500 overall investment and still be able to recover the rocket loaded with a L1000 w potential to breach 10k feet @ mach 1.25. Would need to order, construct/retrofit and ground test between now and launch. Already have avionics bay w stratologger cf fer DD and data telemetry.

Suggestions for the right GPS 900 mhz tracker system very welcome.

Thanks in advance for the advice!
Eric
 
My vote would be for:

https://www.featherweightaltimeters.com/featherweight-gps-tracker.html

Contact Adrian and see if he can get you something mailed out quickly. Works great. You do need an iPhone though but you could probably get that and the trackers in your budget.

Would I also need to mount this inside my payload bay somehow ( maybe labratrocketry or someone with 3D printing can help) or drill and retrofit somehow into the nosecone that is sealed? Really don't want to invest and ruin via ejection charges either...
 
Should be possible to cut a hole in the nose cone bulkhead (I used a Dremel and a rotozip bit for something similar) and put a removable cover on it with screws tapped into the remaining fiberglass. Mounting something on your avbay sled might also work, depends on how much space you have.

Missileworks T3 is inexpensive and in stock.

Using an RDF beacon like the Com-spec tied to the shock cord would be simpler at this stage if you can borrow a receiver from someone.
 
Nothing would prevent you from using your daughter's iPhone for the launch - we would just need her Apple ID in order to add her to the TestFlight list.

It is harder for me to comment on the mounting situation. You would want it protected from the ejection charges. If you had a sealed 'container', you might be able to attach it to the shock cord I guess as it doesn't need vent holes (since it is just a tracker). You might be able to do a sealed PVC container quick and cheap and tape it to the shock cord [but I have never done this myself before so I would want someone with experience in that area to comment as well...]
 
Forgot to mention I have Android. Still an option?

FWIW you can get an iPhone 5 for less than $40 on eBay.

Also, I know it can be frowned upon and not best practice to put your tracker in the normal eBay with all threads, but I haven’t had a problem doing that. The app has a page that you can see signal strengths and I haven’t found any appreciable difference between mounted in the nose cone and mounted in the regular eBay.
 
Should be possible to cut a hole in the nose cone bulkhead (I used a Dremel and a rotozip bit for something similar) and put a removable cover on it with screws tapped into the remaining fiberglass. Mounting something on your avbay sled might also work, depends on how much space you have.

Missileworks T3 is inexpensive and in stock.

Using an RDF beacon like the Com-spec tied to the shock cord would be simpler at this stage if you can borrow a receiver from someone.

Will the T3 work mounted inside pvc and harnessed somehow to the shock cord in the payload bay?
 
FWIW you can get an iPhone 5 for less than $40 on eBay.

Also, I know it can be frowned upon and not best practice to put your tracker in the normal eBay with all threads, but I haven’t had a problem doing that. The app has a page that you can see signal strengths and I haven’t found any appreciable difference between mounted in the nose cone and mounted in the regular eBay.

Thought of trying to squeeze something in the ebay but with my luck the signals will mess with my altimeter and the drogue and/or main will fire prematurely. I already seem to be constantly browning out for a second upon ascension...(Error code 2) and the connections all test good when checked via computer program diagnostics upon recovery...
 
Will the T3 work mounted inside pvc and harnessed somehow to the shock cord in the payload bay?
No electronic reason why this wouldn't work that I know of, although such mounting will probably place more mechanical shock on the unit and no GPS is as mechanically robust as a Com-spec.

FWIW I've flown 900 MHz trackers right next to SL CFs in an avbay with no ill effect. Your report of brownouts is troubling though. Sounds like a bad connection somewhere.
 
I guess I'll also mention that a big flight where you really need the tracking is the wrong time to be using any tracker for the first time -- much better IMHO to build up experience with a flight or two where the tracker isn't so critical.
 
I guess I'll also mention that a big flight where you really need the tracking is the wrong time to be using any tracker for the first time -- much better IMHO to build up experience with a flight or two where the tracker isn't so critical.

Yep! Feel stupid for putting LDRS on the calendar entirely without the previous tracker experience. Agree 100%.
 
T3 does sound like a great investment, or the featherweight. Wonder why such a cost difference in total systems?
T3 ~ $165
Featherweight ~ $352
 
T3 does sound like a great investment, or the featherweight. Wonder why such a cost difference in total systems?
T3 ~ $165
Featherweight ~ $352

The Featherweight GPS price includes a lot of custom software for things like a real-time pointer display on your phone that points toward the rocket using the compass and gyros of your phone, an over-the-horizon relay of lost rocket location from other trackers, voice telemetry, using one ground station for multiple trackers, etc.
 
I own 3 Featherweight devices (2 trackers and 1 ground station). I have walked straight to my rocket every time I have used it. I also have the Eggfinder GPS system and use CommSpec trackers. I cannot speak to the T3 system since I don't own it or have seen it in action. Whether or not you consider the Featherweight system to be expensive is relative, it is under your $500 budget. I do not regret my purchase.
 
One other point to consider is that the Featherweight has its own dedicated and updated app. That can’t be said for the T3 (as far as I know). I had one for a little while and didn’t have a ton of luck with the available finicky apps. The featherweight is very easy and just works really good.
 
T3 has walked me 4 miles to a rocket below ground in an irrigation ditch. I let all my friends use mine. I think it did 5 flights in a weekend, all without issue.

You can't beat the range of a Featherweight without a HAM licence though.
 
T3 uses a 250mW xbee unit and might have a little extra edge over 100mW units. The key is getting the last known position as close to the ground as possible. If a tracker is in a ditch, the ground footprint can be quite poor. If the last known position is from 25 to 50 feet in the air, it will get one darned close. A beeper or noisemaker on the harness can help with vegetation if one has the room. The ears are still a good tracking device.
The Featherweight uses a different LoRa technology that henceforth is giving the fine performance reports. I’ve tracked on a map with a 100mW tracker, not a Featherweight,and made the mistake of not zooming in close enough while recovering. Once I zoomed in, I walked straight to the rocket. Kurt
 
Last edited:
One can consider the loss ratio. Save $700.00 worth of a rocket, electronics and motor hardware more than once and the $352 or whatever one invests in a tracking system sort of pales in comparison. I’ve saved 18 rockets with my APRS Ham trackers and even though that was a $1000.00 option 12 years ago. I consider it paid for itself with hardware saved. We’re talking rockets that disappear sight unseen and are not found until I walked up to them.
A D72a connected to a Garmin 60gs or gsx using an APRS tracker gives a live map capability and ability to indirectly track altitude via the APRS packet. All the while monitoring the flight on the map.
The 900Mhz trackers one can shunt/hack the nmea GPS sentences through other software to achieve that end but it’s a pain.
Yes RDF works but can be a challenge. I’d rather be flying than trying to reacquire a lost signal.
 
All,
I never got the chance to revisit with you all on what I decided to purchase. Since I was in a hurry for LDRS 38 last year, I went with the T3 tx and rx. Custom created a 38mm PVC removable bulkhead system to store the T3 tx and secure reception comfortably. Flight was successful (7000+ft) and recovered with accurate signal within 20' of the rocket's landing location. No sweat!

Prepping my Lvl 3 E bay. I have a custom sled from missile works with another transmitter ordered with a 4" RMPSA. However, I think there is a suggestion on this forum somewhere about using an extension type flex connector from the T3 tx to and through the aft bulkhead where the RMPSA is then attached for signal reception without interfering with the 2 redundant altimeters and avoiding the ever popular "all thread RF" debate. Does anyone know what specific type of extension cord I can use to remediate this situation? It seems like the proper choice vs. risking losing signal or possibly messing up auxiliary electronics in the e-bay.

Thanks kindly again for the advice above and going forward once again!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top