Good deal on the fix, bad deal on it being in such a long 'run' of dates.
The silver lining here is that it's a relatively simple AND forgiving fix.
Easy to fix, less to forgive lost over 40+hrs of work on 2 rockets not to mention the cost of the scratch builds. My 38mm rockets will fly on aerotechs from now on still no word from my vendor on the 4 motors or 2 grain cases
Agree to disagreePart of rocketry. Every manufacturer has had some CATO issue. It's a lather, rinse, repeat cycle.
Use a different vendor.Easy to fix, less to forgive lost over 40+hrs of work on 2 rockets not to mention the cost of the scratch builds. My 38mm rockets will fly on aerotechs from now on still no word from my vendor on the 4 motors or 2 grain cases I lost.
Again, brilliant.Use a different vendor.
Easy to fix, less to forgive lost over 40+hrs of work on 2 rockets not to mention the cost of the scratch builds. My 38mm rockets will fly on aerotechs from now on still no word from my vendor on the 4 motors or 2 grain cases I lost.
Anecdotally, I’ve never seen a CTI Cato.
Not to be overly flippant, but this is a hobby where we’re basically burning time and money for the fun of it. I kiss every rocket goodbye before hitting the launch button. Stuff blowing up on the pad most certainly sucks, but it’s just one of the dozens of ways a flight can end badly. Trees, wind, thermals, ejection failures, chute failure, power lines, water, corn fields, the whole thing catching fire....... No point fuming over it. At least you’ll get the casing replaced and still have some spare parts....
Anecdotally, I’ve never seen a CTI Cato. Have witnessed/experienced a few spectacular Aerotech failures though.
Swapping motor vendors out of spite won’t really improve your odds of taking an undamaged rocket home. But yeah, I understand why you’d want to give your money to the competition for a while...
The "fuming" is that design and manufacture defects are avoidable by the manufacturer.
... I think that there's a pretty good balance between reilability, availability, affordability, and safety in today's market. ALL could be improved, but at what cost? ...
Them stop buying CTI...that'll learn 'em a thing or two. As for your unreviewed and deep stock, that's an entirely self inflicted injury.
BTW... can't vote with your wallet when there is little or no choice.
Sorry for sticking my nose in here, but are you really considering all of the reliable reload choices that are available to you?
16 reloads from G thru J can be shipped by USPS surface mail without hazmat.
No on-site dealer required.
Sorry for sticking my nose in here, but are you really considering all of the reliable reload choices that are available to you?
16 reloads from G thru J can be shipped by USPS surface mail without hazmat.
No on-site dealer required.
Non of us would fly if we thought there was a reasonable chance our hard work would be blown up and knitting is not the answer.
Email me and I can send you a copy. [email protected]Has anyone tried the posted CTI solution for the Pro 38 1G and 2G? I will be launching this coming Saturday (first of the season for our club), and I have the Pro 38 hardware. My only available HPR rocket will require the 1G or 2G, and I'm certain our vendor would not yet have received newer stock with the corrected pellets. I will give it a try and post the results. The suggested fix seems like it could introduce other problems when handling the grains - the phrase "what could possibly go wrong?" comes to mind.
Enter your email address to join: