I've seen plenty of very dangerous impacts of high powered model aircraft, including one where someone got hurt when they were clipped by a wing at high speed. Just because things like this happen doesn't mean someone is going to come take our hobby away from us. What grounds would they use? There are many far more dangerous hobbies out there that continue unabated even after serious safety incidents.
Clearly we have to exercise all due caution but worrying that threads like these are going to get our hobby closed down seems like a gross over reaction.
Tony
Rapid combustion and detonation are two different things.
We can argue about what terms we do or do not like but given extreme enough conditions I'd guess that nearly any fuel-ox combo can experience supersonic burn rates. As a mundane example gasoline and air usually deflagrates but high enough pressure makes it detonate. Gasoline is not by definition an explosive but it certainly can function as one if you try to add too much boost to your car engine. Apcp is by all definitions a fuel and NOT an explosive. Give it enough pressure though and I bet the burn rates would get there.An unburned motor certainly could have catoed. My gripe is with the term “detonate”.
Really it was to share pictures of crazy crashes. The semantics argument just popped up from analyzing the crater and trying to figure out what caused what effect.I am going to ask this bluntly: what is the purpose of this thread? I agree we should watch the term explosion and detonate.
Have you not read anything on TRF? People spilt hairs on the definition of splitting hairs. It's what goes on here. The picture is cool, the possible long term impact is not.Really it was to share pictures of crazy crashes. The semantics argument just popped up from analyzing the crater and trying to figure out what caused what effect.
Noted.I would suggest that you not use the term detonate or explosion. As someone who has extensive experience with seeing and treating the after-effects of explosions. This does not look like one. This looks more like a kinetic effect. A high-speed ballistic impact can have similar effects but is not a detonation or true explosion.
When hitting ground at such high speed the front closure compresses the fuel, under EXTREME pressure & heat [friction]... the obvious then happens. [not going to say it]
Wikipedia said:Detonation
Wikipedia said:(from Latin detonare, meaning 'to thunder down') is a type of combustion involving a supersonic exothermic front accelerating through a medium that eventually drives a shock front propagating directly in front of it. Detonations occur in both conventional solid and liquid explosives.
Fair enough. I just wonder what else you would call it if it rapidly combusted during the extreme compression period of impact?
I seem to recall a wise but ugly man saying something very similar.If you were a landowner and a local club came to you asking if they could launch high power rockets on your land, and then, while doing due diligence to learn about high power rockets you found the picture at the top of this thread, what would your answer likely be?
We’re no better than what we display to the world.
Enter your email address to join: