Winston
Lorenzo von Matterhorn
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 9,560
- Reaction score
- 1,749
Pesky Problems for Lunar Reflectors
Mar 13th, 2014
https://www.davidreneke.com/pesky-problems-for-lunar-reflectors/
Specially-designed reflectors, left on the lunar surface by Russian rovers and Apollo astronauts, are getting less efficient due to a coating of dust — and more so whenever there’s a full Moon.
This bank of reflective prisms, and others like it, left on the lunar surface by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts, is used by astronomers to gauge the Moon’s exact distance from Earth. This is the time of year when my high-school students learn about how the oceans’ incessant tides are gradually causing the Moon to move farther outward and Earth’s rotation to slow very gradually.
As evidence of this energy transfer, I point to four decades of ranging data collected using special reflectors left on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts and the Soviet Union’s Lunokhod 1 and 2 rovers. Astronomers back on Earth periodically fire lasers at these suitcase-size banks of reflectors to determine where the Moon is in its orbit and, specifically, precisely how far it is from Earth. Initially, the laser ranging was good to an accuracy of about 15 cm (6 inches), 100 times better than any previous method.
But in recent years the accuracy has gotten down to nearly 1 mm, thanks to an effort led by Thomas Murphy (University of California, San Diego) using the 3.5-m reflector at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico. (Amusingly, Murphy has named the effort the “Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation,” or APOLLO.) Moreover, thanks to Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s images of the long-lost Lunokhod 1 rover (spotted by Russian scientists, by the way), the count of available reflector sites on the Moon now stands at five.
Some years ago, Murphy and his colleagues noticed that the laser pulses were coming back to Earth weaker than expected. “Each shot sends about 10^17 [100 quadrillion] photons toward the Moon, and in good conditions we detect about one return photon per shot,” the team noted in an article published in Icarus. That’s only about a tenth of what should be coming back, leading to suspicion that a microscopic veneer of lunar dust has coated (or abraded) about half the area of the exposed optical surfaces.
But something else is causing weak returns, and the dropoff gets particularly bad (by another factor of 10) around full Moon. In Icarus, Murphy and his team surmised that the problem is due to distortions in the optics due to heat from the Sun. The Apollo program’s prisms are recessed into shallow cylinders, so sunlight illuminates them fully only at high noon — that is, around the time of full Moon. The thermal effect is much worse for the Lunokhod arrays — they can’t be used at all during the lunar day.
One way to confirm this hypothesis would be to monitor the reflectors’ performance during a total lunar eclipse. The rapid plunge into shadow, Murphy reasoned, should allow the optics to cool and relax. Some earlier observations during eclipses already hinted that solar heating was indeed the culprit, but Apache Point was clouded out during lunar eclipses in 2007 and 2008.
Fortunately, clear skies prevailed during the total lunar eclipse of December 21, 2010, and for 5½ hours the team bounced laser pulses off three Apollo reflector arrays and a fourth on Lunophod 1. Sure enough, the efficiency immediately improved, as Murphy and others report in the March 1st issue of Icarus. Interestingly, none of the laser pulses fired at Lunokhod 1 during the eclipse resulted in detections. However, as the team comments, “In general, the Lunokhod arrays are more susceptible to thermal disruptions than the Apollo arrays, so the lack of returns from Lunokhod 1 during the eclipse is not entirely surprising.”
If you’d like to learn more about the APOLLO laser-ranging program (and what it has to do with deviations in Einstein’s theory of general relativity), check out this entertaining hour-long lecture recorded in early 2011.
Paper: Long-term degradation of optical devices on the Moon
https://tmurphy.physics.ucsd.edu/papers/Icarus-208-31.pdf
Apollo retroreflector:
Mar 13th, 2014
https://www.davidreneke.com/pesky-problems-for-lunar-reflectors/
Specially-designed reflectors, left on the lunar surface by Russian rovers and Apollo astronauts, are getting less efficient due to a coating of dust — and more so whenever there’s a full Moon.
This bank of reflective prisms, and others like it, left on the lunar surface by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts, is used by astronomers to gauge the Moon’s exact distance from Earth. This is the time of year when my high-school students learn about how the oceans’ incessant tides are gradually causing the Moon to move farther outward and Earth’s rotation to slow very gradually.
As evidence of this energy transfer, I point to four decades of ranging data collected using special reflectors left on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts and the Soviet Union’s Lunokhod 1 and 2 rovers. Astronomers back on Earth periodically fire lasers at these suitcase-size banks of reflectors to determine where the Moon is in its orbit and, specifically, precisely how far it is from Earth. Initially, the laser ranging was good to an accuracy of about 15 cm (6 inches), 100 times better than any previous method.
But in recent years the accuracy has gotten down to nearly 1 mm, thanks to an effort led by Thomas Murphy (University of California, San Diego) using the 3.5-m reflector at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico. (Amusingly, Murphy has named the effort the “Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation,” or APOLLO.) Moreover, thanks to Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s images of the long-lost Lunokhod 1 rover (spotted by Russian scientists, by the way), the count of available reflector sites on the Moon now stands at five.
Some years ago, Murphy and his colleagues noticed that the laser pulses were coming back to Earth weaker than expected. “Each shot sends about 10^17 [100 quadrillion] photons toward the Moon, and in good conditions we detect about one return photon per shot,” the team noted in an article published in Icarus. That’s only about a tenth of what should be coming back, leading to suspicion that a microscopic veneer of lunar dust has coated (or abraded) about half the area of the exposed optical surfaces.
But something else is causing weak returns, and the dropoff gets particularly bad (by another factor of 10) around full Moon. In Icarus, Murphy and his team surmised that the problem is due to distortions in the optics due to heat from the Sun. The Apollo program’s prisms are recessed into shallow cylinders, so sunlight illuminates them fully only at high noon — that is, around the time of full Moon. The thermal effect is much worse for the Lunokhod arrays — they can’t be used at all during the lunar day.
One way to confirm this hypothesis would be to monitor the reflectors’ performance during a total lunar eclipse. The rapid plunge into shadow, Murphy reasoned, should allow the optics to cool and relax. Some earlier observations during eclipses already hinted that solar heating was indeed the culprit, but Apache Point was clouded out during lunar eclipses in 2007 and 2008.
Fortunately, clear skies prevailed during the total lunar eclipse of December 21, 2010, and for 5½ hours the team bounced laser pulses off three Apollo reflector arrays and a fourth on Lunophod 1. Sure enough, the efficiency immediately improved, as Murphy and others report in the March 1st issue of Icarus. Interestingly, none of the laser pulses fired at Lunokhod 1 during the eclipse resulted in detections. However, as the team comments, “In general, the Lunokhod arrays are more susceptible to thermal disruptions than the Apollo arrays, so the lack of returns from Lunokhod 1 during the eclipse is not entirely surprising.”
If you’d like to learn more about the APOLLO laser-ranging program (and what it has to do with deviations in Einstein’s theory of general relativity), check out this entertaining hour-long lecture recorded in early 2011.
Paper: Long-term degradation of optical devices on the Moon
https://tmurphy.physics.ucsd.edu/papers/Icarus-208-31.pdf
Apollo retroreflector:
