First, a lot of assumptions being made to say its okay......
The first thing you want to look at is mass distribution to ensure the stability of the rocket remains with a good cp/cg relationship. hard to do without owning the kit. (a reason its good to look at manufacturer recommended motors.) I like kits that have published CP and maybe even a rocksim file easily available.
secondly, you need to look at how it affects the recovery methods. Like shock cord attachment. How it affects the harness storage etc...
For the motor case to mount lengths, there are no respective rules. If you think about it, the motor tube is not even required. it just makes centering the motor easier and provides some benefits of making it easier to seal the airframe for ejection charges to work properly. In other-words reduces the leakiness that causes larger ejection charges to be required.
the mount length also has a benefit of helping the load distribution from the motor thrust to the airframe, and reinforcing the fin roots. I always use the mmt to have atleast a secondary harness attach point, if I am using the motor for the primary harness point.
Good luck with the arcas, I have always liked that rocket.