Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 61 to 67 of 67

Thread: 21-inch by 19-foot "Unfinished Business"

  1. #61
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Location
    Maryland, 20794
    Posts
    251
    TRF,

    Thanks for your encouragement and excellent advice. I'll definitely follow Troj on the next Sonotube.

    Otherwise the topcoat is sanded coarse to 60 grit. That required about 75 minutes. I'll patch and level a few spots then wet sand to a gloss finish.

    Feckless
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	UFB Sanded Mandrel 2.JPG 
Views:	18 
Size:	59.2 KB 
ID:	117144   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	UFB Sanded Mandrel 3.JPG 
Views:	19 
Size:	50.7 KB 
ID:	117145  

  2. #62
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Location
    Maryland, 20794
    Posts
    251
    TRF,

    May I share my split / collapsible mandrel concept for your comment?

    Referring to the picture below:

    1. Mandrel is cut lengthwise to 1/4-inch slot
    2. Angle stock (black) is glued to slot edges inside tube (brown)
    3. U-channel (green) captures angle stock (black)
    4. HDPE strip (white) fills gap for solid vacuum tight seal.

    After lay-up the HDPE and u-channel are pulled to yield a collapsible mandrel. Hopefully the tube will release even though it had been vacuum bagged to the mandrel.

    Feckless
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	UFB Split Concept 1.JPG 
Views:	41 
Size:	154.2 KB 
ID:	117146  

  3. #63
    Join Date
    13th February 2012
    Posts
    2,675
    Quote Originally Posted by Feckless Counsel View Post
    TRF,

    May I share my split / collapsible mandrel concept for your comment?

    Referring to the picture below:

    1. Mandrel is cut lengthwise to 1/4-inch slot
    2. Angle stock (black) is glued to slot edges inside tube (brown)
    3. U-channel (green) captures angle stock (black)
    4. HDPE strip (white) fills gap for solid vacuum tight seal.

    After lay-up the HDPE and u-channel are pulled to yield a collapsible mandrel. Hopefully the tube will release even though it had been vacuum bagged to the mandrel.

    Feckless
    My main concern is: Is it actually going to be vacuum proof? I guess you can plug the gaps with vacuum tape...
    2013 impulse burned: 5205.1 Ns
    2013 impulse lined up to burn: ~56,445 Ns

  4. #64
    troj's Avatar
    troj is online now Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,340
    Quote Originally Posted by CarVac View Post
    My main concern is: Is it actually going to be vacuum proof? I guess you can plug the gaps with vacuum tape...
    Get some two inch wide flash tape, and put that over it.

    My concern is more about the bond of the channel to the cardboard. Vaccuum bagging is going to put pretty decent pressure on that, and unless it's a good, solid bond, at some point it may come loose. Once it comes loose even a little bit, I think it's going to be like a zipper, and just go all the way down, at which point the mandrel is going to collapse.

    Sonotube isn't all that strong; I even if the bond to the metal channel doesn't fail, the tube itself may tear under the load.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  5. #65
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Location
    Maryland, 20794
    Posts
    251
    Kevin,

    Good observation regarding the strength of Sonotube. Pulling the HDPE strip and u-channel will shear the angle stock / tube joint. Going to be a tug-o-war for sure. I'll try to strain relieve that by clamping angle stock to mandrel end caps or, perhaps, placing a few pop rivets outside the layup area.

    Feckless

  6. #66
    Join Date
    16th March 2011
    Location
    Spartanburg SC
    Posts
    1,700
    Just curious, Do you really have to pull a vacuum? I do hand lay up all the time and I have never had to pull a vacuum.
    Eric Foster
    http://www.BaddAzzRocketry.com
    Eric@BaddAzzRocketry.com
    TRA 12959 L3
    Home Club Tripoli SC

  7. #67
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Location
    Maryland, 20794
    Posts
    251
    Eric,

    Thanks for your reply and I really appreciate this question. The short answer is not necessary but please note the goal here is efficiency - big rocket flies high on smallish motor.

    In the previous project, Anima Mundi, airframes were formed as open lay-ups. Recall those were 21.75-inch outside diameter at 0.062 wall thickness. Without rings it was easy to deflect airframes to oval and there was a lot of discussion towards periodic buckling in flight. At this scale more rings, stringers and rest add runaway mass defeating the goal.

    Now I wish to double wall thickness and, therefore, quadruple stiffness at equivalent mass using 2mm Spheretex core material. By open lay-up I will certainly over-saturate that spongy material for a nasty mass penalty. Vacuum bagging onto a bleeder will otherwise result in low resin content, neatly compacted and superior strength airframes.

    Airframe goal is 20.75 inch OD, wall thickness 0.120 at 12 pounds per 48 inch section.

    I look forward to your comments.

    Feckless Indeed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •