Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Spool dimensions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    948

    Spool dimensions

    I'm curious about stable proportions for spool rockets. The ones I've seen (and the one I've flown) have a height that's roughly equivalent to diameter. I wonder how much taller can one make a spool and still have is stay stable on the way up.

    Ari.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th September 2010
    Location
    South Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    4,443
    I can't give you an answer, but I'm very curious of this as well. Got a couple new spools yesterday.
    Unstable by design
    www.wooshrocketry.org NAR Sec. 558
    WOOSH Rocketry (mostly) on YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/user/guytogo75?feature=mhee

  3. #3
    Join Date
    17th June 2012
    Location
    Durham, NH
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by chadrog View Post
    I can't give you an answer, but I'm very curious of this as well. Got a couple new spools yesterday.
    Me too! A guy at work gave me a giant CAT5 spool today, it should make a great HPR rocket. Possibly NAR L2 material?

    From what I've heard through the grapevine, the CP of a flat disk is the disk's diameter in front of the airflow. I know that people have flown spools without the top disk, so this seems to be accurate. But, this has absolutely no mathematical basis and could be completely wrong.
    Level 1 - CTI H133 in an Estes Partizon

    Blog:
    http://awseiger.wordpress.com/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by awseiger View Post
    CP of a flat disk is the disk's diameter in front of the airflow.
    CP must be behind the disk, or it would be unstable.

    Ari.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    17th June 2012
    Location
    Durham, NH
    Posts
    528
    But a disk isn't stable?
    Level 1 - CTI H133 in an Estes Partizon

    Blog:
    http://awseiger.wordpress.com/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by awseiger View Post
    But a disk isn't stable?
    Ordinarily, no. But if you get it going fast enough before it leaves the rod, there's a lot of base drag which brings the CP some way behind the disc and makes it stable, which is why saucers can make stable flights. Once the motor burns out the disc loses velocity very soon due to that drag, making it unstable, so it tumbles down.

    A spool without the top disc is basically a saucer with a tube sticking out of the front; the CP will be as far back as for the basic saucer but the CG may be further forward, if that tube contains something nice and heavy such as the front half of a motor casing. I'd guess that a spool without the bottom disc will be in trouble...

    I have no idea of the maths behind all this so I can't say how fast a disc needs to go to be stable, let alone how far two discs (i.e. a spool) can be apart and still be stable. But since a spool rocket is (a) never going to move very fast and (b) doesn't have a hard pointy bit, it's relatively safe to mess about with. So some experiments involving a spool with a telescoping shaft or a series of spools with varying shaft lengths but otherwise identical might be in order.
    Don't just stand there, get one up!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •