Raspberry Pi
- Thread starter troj
- Start date
Help Support The Rocketry Forum:
rockets4kids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 0
The Telemetrum uses an 8051 MCU core which is rather old and simple and you could probably run it under an 8051 emulator on the Pi, but that is rather absurd...
rockets4kids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 0
The ground station software is written in Java, so I don't see any reason why that wouldn't run on the Pi. But then you are left adding a keyboard, mouse, display, and power source, and putting it all together in a case. It would be a whole lot easier to just use a laptop or tablet. Again, you can do it, but it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Nerull
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 673
- Reaction score
- 0
Failure resistance is about hardware resilience and redundancy. Striving for small size, low power and light weight can make hardware more failure prone, not less.
The Pi is not suitable for a flight computer, but there are a lot more possibilities than that. Only two people seem to be stuck in the flight-computer only mindset, and they seem to be the two people busy declaring nothing could possibly work.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 14,955
- Reaction score
- 1,287
Interesting! I may have to give that a try on another flash drive. I expect a touch interface transferred to a mouse/keyboard will be an epic fail (Windows 8), though.
Mine came from Element 14; it actually came 3 weeks earlier than they last said it would.
I ordered mine back in April; lead times are now about 5 weeks, from what I understand.
-Kevin
RadManCF
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 0
I agree fully, there's a reason I said typical rocketry applications. I focused on the pi's defficiencies in those areas simply because they are perhaps the first things one thinks of when you say electronic payload. That said, I might consider using a pi for something atypical, if it were beyond the abilities of arduino. Like a windshear detection device. Or maybe a full blown weather station.
RadManCF
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 0
I'd think it would be more cost effective to put that control logic in the launch pad. I say the pad, not the controler, because due to minimum personnel distances, conditions could be different at each. I don't know how this would work with the countdown requirement, though.
RadManCF
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 0
I guess that would work. It could be made backward compatible with existing launch control systems- use the firing current to tell the pi to initiate countdown when wind allows. Alternately, a new launch control system could be built around a pi.
I've kicked around ideas for an "Integrated Range Control System" that would combine launch control, communications, and fire suppression into a centrally controled modular system. The pi could be very well suited to this... and probably one of the cheapest components...
Timothy Allen
Active Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2012
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 0
Have fun with your computer. You could use it to control servos for flight stability or to direct you landing. You could control your ejection charges or to monitor that your ejection charges went off and to fire a secondary. You could buy some antennas and try to build a GPS. You could flash LEDs, or play music over a speaker. Whatever you do don't be practical, practical is boring and usually doesn't involve rocket fuel.
sylvie369
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,106
- Reaction score
- 3
So in the future we'll hear the LCO say "5-4-3-2-1 ok, computer, you have my permission to launch when ready".
ClayD
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,440
- Reaction score
- 8
It would have to be passive imo.... where the LCO would have to have the launch button held the entire time, and allow the computer to launch, but stiffle the computer launching if the button is not held down. *this would be required to comply with the safetycodes launch system criteria...*
That way the LCO still has no-go control in the even something changes like a car on the highway, plane, or person not doing what they are suposed to be doing.....
RandyM
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 17
I ordered mine on July 27th and go it on August 8th. Looks like they are caught up for now. Not sure what I'm going to do with it, but I'm a geek. What can I say. I'm sure at some point, it will fly in a rocket of mine.
It will only be there to collect data, just not sure what data it will collect yet. :sigh:
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 14,955
- Reaction score
- 1,287
What distro are you running? As far as I know, all the Java installs use soft float, which is slow on the Pi. Oracle says they're working on a hard float install, which will perform a lot better, at which point OpenRocket and such will perform better.
-Kevin
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 14,955
- Reaction score
- 1,287
Let me know how it works, after you try it. I've not yet installed it on mine.
-Kevin
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 14,955
- Reaction score
- 1,287
Well, after a few mis-steps I now have the system running Openoffice, java AND Openrocket. Openoffice runs very well for my tastes, not blazing fast but not irritatingly slow either. Openrocket does run fairly slow - I would not use it in this envirnment as my primary development platform, however, I find it quite effective for field operations to check out changes made while prepping for flight. All in all I am happy with the results so far.
Kevin,
The initial startup and execution of the simulations are a little slow, the UI responses were fine. I haven't tried the plots yet - I will get to those tonight. The startup and execution is only objectionable when compared to today's instant gratification culture with multi-GB memory and multi-core multi-GHz CPUs. Coming from an era where computers only existed in large businesses and colleges, it is more than acceptable to me. I just wanted people to not expect blazing performance from this platform. The fact that it runs at all impresses me the most.
Guy
The initial startup and execution of the simulations are a little slow, the UI responses were fine. I haven't tried the plots yet - I will get to those tonight. The startup and execution is only objectionable when compared to today's instant gratification culture with multi-GB memory and multi-core multi-GHz CPUs. Coming from an era where computers only existed in large businesses and colleges, it is more than acceptable to me. I just wanted people to not expect blazing performance from this platform. The fact that it runs at all impresses me the most.
Guy
Last edited:
mdoering
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2012
- Messages
- 516
- Reaction score
- 1
I have a feeling that wouldn't be legal... I think at that point the term "guided missile" is more appropriate than "amateur rocket"
Being a computer geek, I'd love to throw a Raspberry Pi in a rocket and have it do things... but then again, my sprinklers run on shell scripts and relays with a custom HTML5 GUI (and native iOS app)...
