AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY!
I don't *mind* the newsbot stuff, except when the darn thing posts 5 links to the same story, or various variations thereof... and the fact that it doesn't distinguish between the links to VIDEOS rather than the print stories on the specific topic... I've gotten a TON of EXTREMELY cool HST pix off newsbot links to space.com over the years (til my hard drive crashed and consumed them all anyway) that I used as desktop photos... and sometimes the stories are somewhat interesting, though space.com's writing and fact-checking leaves a lot to be desired...
BUT, since this stupid new "answer this question to read the rest of the article" crap started, I have ZERO interest in even looking at their stuff... for one, the questions are incredibly stupid to downright "NOYDB"... (none of yer d*** bizness) and while they "need them to make money" the stupid webpage is SO cluttered with pop-ups and sidebar ads and ads embedded in the text and having to jump around all over the page trying to read between the ads and crap just to read the story, that it's just not worth bothering with anymore...
Nasaspaceflight.com has MUCH better written and researched stories, not the sensationalistic tripe that usually is touted as "news" on space.com, and the presentation is MUCH more readable and enjoyable... plus they have a KICK BUTT forum for reading and discussing spaceflight history, issues, etc... its a terrific resource and populated with a lot of people within the industry, not a bunch of know-nothing bloggers from Facebook and other such rubbish...
I'm done with space.com until they clean up their act, if ever... and I wouldn't miss newsbot if it went away...
Later! OL JR
