Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: FFG vs. FFFFG

  1. #1
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950

    FFG vs. FFFFG

    My local retailers only stock FFG Pyrodex. I wonder how far that is from FFFFG powder that regular ejection charges use.

    Ari.

  2. #2
    troj's Avatar
    troj is offline Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,374
    More Fs = smaller grain size = faster burn

    Have you asked about FFFg or FFFFg? FFg is normally used for rifles; as I recall, pistols normally use FFFg, and FFFFg is what is used in the pan on muskets.

    If asked, the retailer may be able to get you FFFg or FFFFg.

    Otherwise, ground test to figure out how much of the FFg you need.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  3. #3
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Posts
    37
    You can order 4F powder online from Graf and Son's. http://www.grafs.com/ . When I purchased from them 3 years ago they required the purchase of 2lbs not sure if that is still a requriement.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    430
    I've had no problems using 3F (true) BP, but I'm not sure you would want to drop back to 2F. I got mine at the local Bass Pro shop. Perhaps one of your local retailers could order you a can?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    8th July 2011
    Location
    Ilwaco, Washington
    Posts
    353
    I have used 2F for ground testing and have had no problems with it. (I like to save the BP for flight.) I have not used 2F in flight yet, but in a pinch I would use it (only in an old rocket, that is beat up and if it prangs I wouldn't cry) and if it passes flight testing, then I would use it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    Thank you for your responses guys. I like the emphasis on ground testing.

    Ari.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    25th January 2009
    Posts
    83
    I've used everything from cannon grade to meal d/4FG, no problems on either end of the size spectrum. Fireworks shells are commonly lifted with 2FA, which is basically equivalent to cannon grade and it's much gentler, but still produces the same volume of gas. Personally, I like the cannon grade stuff better as it's gentler but still fast enough to get the laundry out. I also think it passes fire faster among grains since there's more space between them, which eliminates worry about containment like smokeless powders. YMMV

    Ground test or blow it out or blow it up (or both...), but ground testing is a better idea.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    west Ft Worth
    Posts
    1,971
    iter,

    I don't know how to try to make this not sound like I am being a smartie, because just as soon as I post it that is exactly what it is going to sound like, but-----there is a collective ton of info already posted here on TRF on this subject (blackpowder substitutes, forms of Pyrodex, how to make Pyrodex work effectively, etc) in the old links and also in the archive from TRF 1.0

    Probably worth some time trying combinations of search terms.....
    In dog beers, I've only had one....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    14th March 2009
    Posts
    1,492
    Just to be safe I have to say that you can't use Pyrodex like "FFFFG powder that regular ejection charges use". If you would put Pyrodex into the ejection well of any RMS motor it would just burn. Black powder will explode and produce enough force to eject a parachute. Pyrodex will just burn unless contained. I'm hoping you know this, but better safe than sorry.
    Zeus-cat
    NAR# 92125 L1

    Total Impulse for 2011: 1,729 N/s

    Total Impulse for 2012: 1,689 N/s

    Total Impulse for 2013: 795 N/s

    A:6, B:5, C:19 D:15, E:4 F:0, G:0, H:1, I:0
    Flights: 46

  10. #10
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    west Ft Worth
    Posts
    1,971
    Z-C makes an important point: Pyrodex (and all the non-blackpowder blackpowder "substitutes") have significantly different combustion properties than plain old gunpowder.

    Continuing the just to be safe thing, and at the risk of over-explaining what has already been posted probably two dozen times, Pyrodex ejection charges have to be contained more strongly to get them to combust completely. A lot of people who use Pyrodex-type materials put them into a small plastic vial and tape over the open end with several layers of tape. If the Pyrodex ejection charge is not properly installed, the first bit of Pyrodex will burn and push out the rest of the ejection charge without igniting it, setting up a problem situation where insufficient gas is created to deploy all the recovery gear. Keeping the Pyrodex contained inside the ejection charge well is necessary to get it all to burn and to create the necessary ejection event.

    You don't have nearly the same problems with real blackpowder.
    In dog beers, I've only had one....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    I make some tests today. I use coat-hanger tube, 3/8" poplar dowel plugs with yellow glue and a tantalum capacitor for initiation.

    The first tube I make holds about 1 gram of FFG Pyrodex. It blows a 3" nosecone 10' into the air.

    The second tube has 2.0 grams (my measurement is more precise on that one). It blows the same 3" nosecone 50-60' into the air and breaks a 3/32" bulkhead in the tube. The experience most resembles firing a mortar.

    I'm hesitant to test the 2.2 gram tube :=)

    Now, where do I buy blackpoweder blackpowder?

    Ari.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1094.JPG 
Views:	31 
Size:	290.0 KB 
ID:	86614  

  12. #12
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Behind enemy lines in Socialist California
    Posts
    3,865
    Are you by any chance Ari K of L.U.N.A.R.?

    If so, I've seen your big boost glider at a launch recently and we chatted.
    Kit (AKA Cranky Kong)
    Total Total Impulse as BAR: 7,753.69 Ns (Equivalent to a 51% M motor.)

    =| Calirado, Colofornia...what's the diff anymore? |=

  13. #13
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    I am him. Embarrassingly, I cannot associate your name with your face or your rockets. Perhaps you can remind me the chat--was it Moffett or Snow Ranch?

    I have a thread on the SkyFun in the boost glider section: http://www.rocketryforum.com/showthr...-Foamie-SkyFun . Sadly, I crash it over the weekend while fiddling with the autopilot. I'm building a new, simpler version of the glider for my L1 cert attempt.

    Ari.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    25th January 2009
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    Posts
    381
    Quote Originally Posted by iter View Post
    I make some tests today. I use coat-hanger tube, 3/8" poplar dowel plugs with yellow glue and a tantalum capacitor for initiation.

    The first tube I make holds about 1 gram of FFG Pyrodex. It blows a 3" nosecone 10' into the air.

    The second tube has 2.0 grams (my measurement is more precise on that one). It blows the same 3" nosecone 50-60' into the air and breaks a 3/32" bulkhead in the tube. The experience most resembles firing a mortar.
    Improperly contained Pyrodex will fail to reliably eject. Properly contained Pyrodex will create a heck of a bang if you use it by weight and base things off the online calculators. BP is much heavier for the same volume and consequently you don't weigh Pyrodex and substitute it in for BP - you have to either measure by volume or just create your own charts based on results.
    Member of ROCC
    My Page

  15. #15
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleVanya View Post
    Properly contained Pyrodex will create a heck of a bang
    I'm noticing just that :=)

    Ari.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    I have a separate thread on it here <http://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?37422-R-C-deployment> but I feel this video is relevant to the Pyrodex topic of this thread. This is 1 gram of Pyrodex:


  17. #17
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    360
    I use pyrodex in 1/2 inch vinyl tube with the ends hot glued. You can also attend a Tripoli Central California launch and purchase BP from What's Up Hobbies.
    Karl Baumheckel
    TRA 11594 L3

  18. #18
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    I worry about using hot glue on pyrodex.

    Ari.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    360
    I have made dozens of ejection canisters and never had a problem with hot glue. I used to apply the hot glue directly to the pyrodex but now I insert a piece of foam rubber so that hot glue never touches the powder. I actually do this so that I can keep the powder tight in the tube.
    Karl Baumheckel
    TRA 11594 L3

  20. #20
    Join Date
    22nd April 2012
    Location
    California City, CA, USA
    Posts
    959
    Pyrodex is a direct replacement for black powder on a strictly VOLUME-FOR-VOLUME basis ONLY. Going by weight can easily lead to an overload and damaged gear - or serious injury. Proceed with EXTREME caution.
    TARASDAD
    Rocketry Novice
    Estes - Big Bertha (1); Big Daddy (0); Vagabond (1); V2 (2); STM 012 (0); QCC Explorer (0)
    Custom Rockets - Redliner (0)
    Aerotech - IQSY Tomahawk (1)
    Semroc - Hawk Boost Glider (0)
    In the build pile
    PemTech Screaming Green Meanie; K&S Super Flash

  21. #21
    Join Date
    9th June 2012
    Location
    Silicon Vallaey, Calif.
    Posts
    950
    Tarasdad: Thank you for your warning. I use purely experimental means to derive the necessary amount of powder to use in my application. "No black powder formulas were used in the production of this movie."

    Karl: Thank you for sharing this bit of experience. Even though a hot glue gun's temperature is lower than Pyrodex ignition temperature, I'm reluctant to experiment with this. Now that I know that you are using hot glue safely, I'm much more comfortable sing it myself.

    Ari.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •