Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: black brant photos

  1. #1
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241

    black brant photos

    Ok this is for all of you Black Brant lovers.

    all photos are of the Black Brant 2B version with 4 fins

    sorry no date or round numbers available

    enjoy

    Bobby
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 1 .jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	356.9 KB 
ID:	86113   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 2.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	61.1 KB 
ID:	86114   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 4.JPG 
Views:	109 
Size:	84.7 KB 
ID:	86115   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 5.jpg 
Views:	104 
Size:	91.4 KB 
ID:	86116   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 6.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	81.2 KB 
ID:	86118  


  2. #2
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241
    and 1 more photo
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo 3.JPG 
Views:	115 
Size:	151.9 KB 
ID:	86119  

  3. #3
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Posts
    120
    That last photo is an interesting one. The fins are appear to be smaller and don't have a swept trailing edge.

    Dave Fitch

  4. #4
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241

    re

    Dave

    wish i could decipher the round number on the fin

    possible

    NRC ________ II__________
    AB or AD 48 42 60 52 ect

    bobby




    Quote Originally Posted by Ez2cDave View Post
    That last photo is an interesting one. The fins are appear to be smaller and don't have a swept trailing edge.

    Dave Fitch

  5. #5
    Join Date
    22nd July 2011
    Location
    Where ever the the boss sends me...
    Posts
    1,340
    Also noted, and maybe its the shadows, but looks to me that the nose cone is not conical, almost VC like....
    Terry

    NAR L1
    2013: 1 E-16, 1 E-9, and a B6-4... I'm way behind

  6. #6
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241
    T-rex

    Looks conical to me . the booklet that the photo was used in was dated 1965

    Bobby

  7. #7
    Join Date
    18th March 2012
    Location
    Apex, NC.
    Posts
    3,145
    Which one is the one that Oldham launched?
    Matt Tripoli Junior Member# 14257

    2013 motors:
    AT 38-360 H178DM (283ns)
    CTI Pro-29 3 Grain 138G106-14A (138ns)
    CTI Pro-29 1 Grain 55F29-12A (55ns)
    Estes C6-5 (9ns)
    Estes B4-2 (4ns)
    Total Newton Seconds for 2013: 489ns
    2.4% of N5800
    Largest Motor flown: Aerotech H178DM (38-360)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241
    His was the 3 fin version of the Black Brant 2A
    this is the 4 fin version of the Black Brant 2B

  9. #9
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by bobby_hamill View Post
    His was the 3 fin version of the Black Brant 2A
    this is the 4 fin version of the Black Brant 2B
    Photo 1 caption: "FIGURE 1 - Black Brant IIA four-fin Rocket vehicle."
    Photo 2 caption: "FIGURE 2 - Black Brant IIA four-fin on the launcher."


    According to an article at Designation Systems, the Black Brant II was the three-finned version and the Black Brant IIA was the four-finned one. On the other hand, Encyclopedia Astronautica shows a list which appears to include Black Brant II and Black Brant IIB but has no reference to the Black Brant IIA.
    Don't just stand there, get one up!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    7th July 2011
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by bobby_hamill View Post
    Ok this is for all of you Black Brant lovers.
    Great photos! Thanks for sharing them.
    John

    CAR-ACF# S 337
    NAR# 91049
    SAM# 0323

    Life begins when the countdown reaches zero!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241
    on some of the reports I have there are 3 fin and 4 fin Black Brant 2A and 2B vehicles and a few Black Brant 2B vehicles were used as test beds to test Black Brant 4 and 5 fins as well as the Black Brant 5 ogive nose cone

  12. #12
    Join Date
    17th June 2012
    Posts
    3
    Some clarification is in order.

    Based on my research the designations Black Brant IIA and IIB are in reference to the engine only (15KS25000 vs 23KS20000). The name Black Brant II was used unofficially to refer to the BBIIA configuration. These designations have nothing to do with the fin or payload configuration.

    At least five different aft body and fin configurations were used on the Black Brant IIA. No official naming convention was adopted to distiguish the different configurations. The first was the three fin version made famous by the Estes and FSI kits. This configuration was a total failure and abandoned after only a few launches. The second configuration is the four fin version shown in Bobby's photos. This version was used for the majority of Black Brant IIA launches, and with a modified aft body for all four BBIIB launches. A third version was a modified three fin configuration which used wedges on the trailing edge to control roll rate. Although used quite a bit it suffered poorer performance than the four fin configuration. The fins for the Black Brant V were tested and then modified (thicker ablative coating) for use with the 15KS25000 engine. This configuaration would eventually use the designation Black Brant VA but started life being known as a BBIIA. Finally a flat "slab" fin was developed for the AFGL and used on a small number of launches. However, most of the documentation for these launches refer to the configuration as a BBVA mod 1. Black Brant IV fins were never used on a single stage 15KS250000 Black Brant but the engine does form the first stage of all BBIV.

    The majority of payload componants for Black Brants were manufactured by either Bristol Aerospace or SED Systems with some specialized payload componants developed by the AFGL. These parts were were generally interchangable. Resulting payloads varied greatly by length, nose cone type and even diameter on occasion. The payload configuration had nothing to do with the overall vehicle designation. As such there was no "BBV nose" or "BBII nose".

    One more thing. The black and white checkered marking were used primarily by CARDE for test launches. Typical operational BBII were usually all black or had a red painted motor.

    LT

  13. #13
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Posts
    241
    some of the Black Brant 2s with the checkerboard fin pattern were launched
    by the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratory

    Bobby

  14. #14
    Join Date
    17th June 2012
    Posts
    3
    Bobby,

    If you have any photographic documentation of AFCRL or AFGL black brants I'd love to see it.

    LT

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •