Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Estes Sentinel Upscale

  1. #1
    Join Date
    19th January 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    266

    Estes Sentinel Upscale

    I actually built this 2.56 diameter upscale years ago based on the Estes Sentinel I already had and launched it many times on G's. It got beat up over the years so last week I sanded it down a bit, gave it a new paint job and just finished applying vinyl decals from Mark at Stickershock. Hope to let her rip on an F-50 this weekend, yahoo!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sentinelbefore.jpg 
Views:	62 
Size:	116.6 KB 
ID:	83990   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SentinelReborn1.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	70.2 KB 
ID:	83991   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SentinelReborndone.jpg 
Views:	132 
Size:	55.9 KB 
ID:	83992  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    20th January 2011
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Posts
    3,172
    Excellent work!


    - jeff

  3. #3
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,638
    Sweet, my favorite sport-scale missile. I've planned on doing one for some time now, along with many other upscale that haven't yet made it to fruition. I'm sure you can relate.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Posts
    119
    Love that rocket, and yours are exceptional!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th February 2009
    Location
    Montreal, Qweebec
    Posts
    649
    Super kudos to your work! Nicely done! And cut vinyl is totally the way to go! This too, is one of my favorites!

    Could we ask you to post some details? Fin dims mainly? So we might also make a fabulous upscale..
    I assume that's a 'Binder Desing' long nose cone..
    -paul

    I don't know the same things you don't know..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    19th January 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by gdjsky01 View Post
    Excellent work!


    - jeff
    Cool, thanks Jeff!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    19th January 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by dr wogz View Post
    Super kudos to your work! Nicely done! And cut vinyl is totally the way to go! This too, is one of my favorites!

    Could we ask you to post some details? Fin dims mainly? So we might also make a fabulous upscale..
    I assume that's a 'Binder Desing' long nose cone..
    Yeah, thanks guys for the positive comments and hats off to Mark at Stickershock- Give me a little time this weekend and I'll edit this post with some details on the parts and process as I remember it anyway. I'm making a same upscale sized Citation Patriot and Nike-X now if i can just find a bigger Nike-X nose cone.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    1st August 2009
    Location
    The Hinterland
    Posts
    5,985
    Nice work.....I REALLY LIKE THE LOOKS OF THAT UPSCALE !!

    Paul T
    ROCKETRY DELINQUENT ,I put my soul in what I do.

    I built a rocket, and on the seventh day ,I rested


    Level 3
    CAR 1033
    Manitoba Rocketry Group

    CTI a better way to fly !

  9. #9
    Join Date
    29th October 2009
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls,Ohio
    Posts
    772
    Quote Originally Posted by Dseter View Post
    Yeah, thanks guys for the positive comments and hats off to Mark at Stickershock- Give me a little time this weekend and I'll edit this post with some details on the parts and process as I remember it anyway. I'm making a same upscale sized Citation Patriot and Nike-X now if i can just find a bigger Nike-X nose cone.
    The Nike X is one that I would like to upscale,can you post those details to?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    8,138
    Woot!
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    hurricane utah
    Posts
    2,817
    Now that is just cool!
    Custom Vinyl decals,
    STICKERSHOCK23.COM


    Stickershock23@gmail.com

    No matter how much you push the envelope.
    it'll still be stationery.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    15th October 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by Dseter View Post
    I actually built this 2.56 diameter upscale years ago based on the Estes Sentinel I already had and launched it many times on G's. It got beat up over the years so last week I sanded it down a bit, gave it a new paint job and just finished applying vinyl decals from Mark at Stickershock. Hope to let her rip on an F-50 this weekend, yahoo!
    Beautiful rockets! This was one of my favorite kits as a kid, "back in the day" and I've recently been pondering an up-scale, so let me echo the request for dimensions (don't have mine any more). Fins particularly, but also BT length (wondering if it was just an 18" tube) and nose cone length. I figure the internals I can work out on my own (hmmm, cluster? Maybe HPR 38mm?)

    Thanks!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    5th February 2009
    Location
    Montreal, Qweebec
    Posts
    649
    I have the fin sheet, from Jim Z's site, jsut need to "input" them into the CAD device.

    And, yes, I check teh BT, and it's an 18" lenth.

    The nosecone si a strange one though. Probabaly the only long nosecone Estes ever put out, and only for one rocket. definitely strange..
    -paul

    I don't know the same things you don't know..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    19th January 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by emckee View Post
    Beautiful rockets! This was one of my favorite kits as a kid, "back in the day" and I've recently been pondering an up-scale, so let me echo the request for dimensions (don't have mine any more). Fins particularly, but also BT length (wondering if it was just an 18" tube) and nose cone length. I figure the internals I can work out on my own (hmmm, cluster? Maybe HPR 38mm?)

    Thanks!
    Yes, apologies for the delay, life got in the way of all my fun here- the upscale BT is 2.5" Diameter and 30 inches length. The nose cone is 13 inches long from point to the beginning of the shoulder and the shoulder is 2 3/4 inches long. I think the cone is PML ( Like the Callisto) but the tube is more likely a LOC Precision tube but I really don't remember. I'll try to get some measurements on the fins by the end of this weekend, thanks for the interest!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    14th October 2010
    Location
    Middle TN
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by dr wogz View Post
    The nosecone si a strange one though. Probabaly the only long nosecone Estes ever put out, and only for one rocket. definitely strange..
    The Sentinel used a PNC-60RL nose cone. The Vagabond is the only current Estes kit that uses that nose cone.
    'Til next time,

    Mike Toelle

    NAR 31692 L1

    SAM 0373

  16. #16
    Join Date
    2nd May 2011
    Location
    Frisco/Plano TX
    Posts
    2,627
    OK, That falls into the extremely cool catagory---VERY NICE INDEED!!!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    17th June 2009
    Location
    San Tan Valley, AZ
    Posts
    187
    Just found this thread while searching for "Estes Sentinel" great looking upscale! I'm planning on doing one in 4". I have the decals from Mark at Stickershock. He made them for me a few years ago, but I've been on Hiatus.
    I'd built a 5.5" version a LONG time ago, I think it was 1998. Here's a pic of it at Springfest, back when the launches were at El Dorado, instead of Jean, NV.
    It met a sad end on it's first and only flight. Very small, simple, stupid mistake on my part. Oh well, live and learn!

    Ron
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sentinel3.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	51.4 KB 
ID:	115132   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sentinel6.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	63.3 KB 
ID:	115133  
    Ron Zeppin
    TRA 6024 L3
    AHPRA

    Stupidity should be painful!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    18th March 2012
    Location
    Apex, NC.
    Posts
    3,179
    Quote Originally Posted by AZ_Ron View Post
    It met a sad end on it's first and only flight. Very small, simple, stupid mistake on my part. Oh well, live and learn!

    Ron
    Quick-Link?



    If so, troj has some competition...
    Matt Tripoli Junior Member# 14257

    2013 motors:
    AT 38-360 H178DM (283ns)
    CTI Pro-29 3 Grain 138G106-14A (138ns)
    CTI Pro-29 1 Grain 55F29-12A (55ns)
    Estes C6-5 (9ns)
    Estes B4-2 (4ns)
    Total Newton Seconds for 2013: 489ns
    2.4% of N5800
    Largest Motor flown: Aerotech H178DM (38-360)

  19. #19
    Join Date
    17th June 2009
    Location
    San Tan Valley, AZ
    Posts
    187
    LOL...Nope, that's what mode of failure I've not done myself. We have a local guy who's had crashes due to open qwik-links several times though!

    I did something new (at the time) on this when I built it. I went with a zipperless construction, single deployment with the chute being
    pulled out from the payload bay, instead of being blown out with the nosecone.
    I used a 50' kevlar leash that I'd used before with a Rocketman chute. I also attached the chute in the same location I normally did, about 5' from
    the nosecone on the leash. At deployment, it was picture perfect, except for the part where the chute was supposed to deploy.
    The harness stretched fully out, but because of where I'd attached the chute, the chute was still just inside the payload section.
    about 2' of the shroud lines were out, but not enough to pull the chute the rest of the way out. It landed hard. We walked out to it, and
    just pulled the chute right out. It wasn't tight at all. Took us a little bit to figure out what happened. Had I flipped the harness around to where
    the chute was attached 5' from the booster section, it would have been one of my best flights ever. Devil's in the details!

    R
    Ron Zeppin
    TRA 6024 L3
    AHPRA

    Stupidity should be painful!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    15th May 2009
    Location
    Northern Illinois Rocket Assembly and Test Facility (NIRATF)
    Posts
    1,317
    Quote Originally Posted by AZ_Ron View Post
    I did something new (at the time) on this when I built it. I went with a zipperless construction, single deployment with the chute being pulled out from the payload bay, instead of being blown out with the nosecone. I used a 50' kevlar leash that I'd used before with a Rocketman chute. I also attached the chute in the same location I normally did, about 5' from the nosecone on the leash. At deployment, it was picture perfect, except for the part where the chute was supposed to deploy. The harness stretched fully out, but because of where I'd attached the chute, the chute was still just inside the payload section. about 2' of the shroud lines were out, but not enough to pull the chute the rest of the way out. It landed hard. We walked out to it, and just pulled the chute right out. It wasn't tight at all. Took us a little bit to figure out what happened. Had I flipped the harness around to where the chute was attached 5' from the booster section, it would have been one of my best flights ever. Devil's in the details!
    Ouch. As I was reading that, I was picturing the exact same scenario played out last fall in a local L2 certification attempt. The flyer had a short rocket with a heavy nose cone, and wanted the nose cone to land first, so he switched the shock cord around to give the nose cone the longer length of shock cord, which left a short length between the rocket body and the parachute attachment point. The motor ejection managed to blow the nose cone and its really long shock cord clear, but left a substantial part of the parachute in the payload bay. No matter how hard the nose pulled on the shock cord during its long fall from apogee, there remained slack in the shroud lines and the parachute stayed put. End result was a cracked fin. Bummer.

    P.S. Nice looking rocket, Dseter. Sorry for the thread hijack.
    Wisconsin Organization of Spacemodeling Hobbyists
    Fox Valley Rocketeers
    Indiana Rocketry
    Quad Cities Rocketry Society


    2012 APCP: 41,326.8 Ns (1% P)
    Highest altitude achieved: 21,981' AGL

    "Gravity is a cruel and unpredictable mistress"

  21. #21
    Join Date
    17th June 2009
    Location
    San Tan Valley, AZ
    Posts
    187
    Not to continue the hijack, but here's a video of the flight. Please keep in mind this was back in I believe '98 or '99, recorded on videotape.
    http://youtu.be/Mw7DAEQSREs

    Ron
    Ron Zeppin
    TRA 6024 L3
    AHPRA

    Stupidity should be painful!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    4th October 2011
    Location
    Davenport IA
    Posts
    91
    So glad I found this thread. The Sentinel was the one rocket kit that my older brother built when we were younger that him and his friend use to launch. I never got into them as a kid myself but I remember seeing this rocket sitting on his dresser every time I walked into his room. I love the looks of it and since I found this thread a couple of days ago I am determined to do a build from scratch to specs. Reading through this thread it was mentioned that the Vagabond uses the same NC as this kit did (at least shape and size) so I ran out to Hobby Lobby with my 40% off and bought a kit. I got real nervous after I bought the kit and then started looking at the Rocksim file only to see that the file shows the kit as a BT-55 and not a BT-60, I thought I had just wasted my money and immediately lost interest. However after searching and reading an old thread on the Sentinel it was clear that the file is wrong and it is indeed a BT-60... just going to steal the NC, the 18" section of tube and the parachute out of the kit and build everything else. Happy once again and eager to build!

  23. #23
    Join Date
    15th October 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    114
    For those of you who have done upscales on the Sentinel design, what have you used for fin material, and what thickness? Those aft fins have a large surface area, and I suspect would be prone to flutter under the wrong conditions, so I'd love to hear what you used and whether you've cracked your fillets, lost a fin, etc

    Thanks!
    Erik

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •