Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Need help choosing from 3 designs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    4th March 2011
    Location
    Coachella Valley, California
    Posts
    562

    Need help choosing from 3 designs

    I'm scoping out my next project, and I've come up with 3 concepts/ designs. They're just sketches, but I might consider plotting the chosen design on Rocsim... of course, then i'll have to buy it I guess.

    Anyhow, I have 3 designs I'm posting here, and I just want to see which one you guys like best. Thanks for your input!



    THIS IS CONCEPT #1
    The first image shows the fins "retracted". When the rocket is on the rail and the launch button is pushed, a cable snaps and releases the fins. The fins trigger the igniter, and the rocket launches.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	a.jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	73.2 KB 
ID:	83349Click image for larger version. 

Name:	b.jpg 
Views:	55 
Size:	89.9 KB 
ID:	83350
    Fair winds, soft landings, and total victory! -

  2. #2
    Join Date
    4th March 2011
    Location
    Coachella Valley, California
    Posts
    562
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	d.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	96.7 KB 
ID:	83353Concept #2
    This rocket is an "open-body" design; It has no nose cone, and it is open through the entire airframe

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	e.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	71.5 KB 
ID:	83352
    Fair winds, soft landings, and total victory! -

  3. #3
    Join Date
    4th March 2011
    Location
    Coachella Valley, California
    Posts
    562
    Concept #3
    This is nothing special, except that when you snap a photo while it's taking off, you will see the faces in both the nose cone and the fins.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	c.jpg 
Views:	43 
Size:	74.2 KB 
ID:	83354
    Fair winds, soft landings, and total victory! -

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Behind enemy lines in Socialist California
    Posts
    3,906
    I'm under the impression that you already tried out the Concept #2 bird.

    Weren't there pictures of it posted here?
    Kit (AKA Cranky Kong)
    Total Total Impulse as BAR: 7,753.69 Ns (Equivalent to a 51% M motor.)

    =| Calirado, Colofornia...what's the diff anymore? |=

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th March 2011
    Location
    Coachella Valley, California
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by o1d_dude View Post
    I'm under the impression that you already tried out the Concept #2 bird.

    Weren't there pictures of it posted here?
    You're referring to "see-thru-p-o"..... That was a small inside diameter that was grossly underpowered by 3 AT-10 motors. This time I plan to do it right, with plenty of "umpffff"
    Fair winds, soft landings, and total victory! -

  6. #6
    Join Date
    1st May 2011
    Location
    Utah Canyon Country
    Posts
    914
    If it was me building, I'd go for number two. I tend to like cleaner and more spare designs, but that's just me. This one looks pretty cool.

    But number one is MUCH more along the lines of what I view as your aesthetic. That one is way more "you" (to me). I'd love to see what you do with it.

    So, my vote is definately for Number ONE.

    Please post build thread/pics.

    s6

  7. #7
    Join Date
    12th March 2011
    Location
    Delta Colorado
    Posts
    204
    Why build one, when you can build all 3?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    29th October 2009
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls,Ohio
    Posts
    772
    I'd go with Number 1,very cool design.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •