Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 13mm lament

  1. #1
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    Too far from the event horizon.
    Posts
    701

    13mm lament

    I don't know about ya'll, but I find it unfortunate that with 13mm motors, there are no choices besides the Estes offerings. Personally, I'd like to see some APCP 13mm's. Would a full B or small C be too much to ask?

    Apparently...


    Vent over.


    Later!

    --Coop

  2. #2
    Join Date
    10th October 2010
    Location
    Erie Colorado
    Posts
    383
    They were fun when they were available, but there isn't enough market at the price they have to be sold at to justify manufacturing them. When they were available they were manufactured by Aerotech in a batch that was pre-paid by Ed LaCroix when he owned Apogee. I don't know if he'd consider it, but Gary would probably only do it on the same basis again.
    Peter Olivola

  3. #3
    Join Date
    1st April 2011
    Location
    Utah / UROC
    Posts
    2,344
    Dang you got be day dreaming......
    An estes gnome on a C engine!

    Alex
    Scratch Build!
    Subscribe to my Youtube Channel!
    NAR 93498
    TRA 14188
    NAR Jr. L1
    TRA Jr. Flier
    2013 motors: I:2, J:1

  4. #4
    Join Date
    16th August 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, CANADA
    Posts
    1,888
    Quote Originally Posted by Aksrockets View Post
    Dang you got be day dreaming......
    An estes gnome on a C engine!

    Alex
    Oh yeah!


    Actually gram for gram, the 13mm engines have a phenomenal performance rating. Having a small minimum diameter rocket with one of those (I love the A3's) and getting up near 1000 feet is not out of reach.

    And they really are cheap thrills!
    Plays with wood, cardboard, and carpenters glue at home.

    L1 will have to wait until 2013. Oh well.......patience is a lost virtue any-ways...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Back up in the woods
    Posts
    7,557
    http://www.nar.org/SandT/pdf/Quest/A3T_cn.pdf

    I don't know when or if these will become available for regular consumers.
    Mark S. Kulka NAR 86134 L1, ASTRE 471, Adirondack Mtns., NY
    Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
    In the forest no one can hear you order a grande caffè misto.
    Warning: I brake for invisible squirrels

  6. #6
    Join Date
    16th August 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, CANADA
    Posts
    1,888
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkII View Post
    http://www.nar.org/SandT/pdf/Quest/A3T_cn.pdf

    I don't know when or if these will become available for regular consumers.
    Love the specs on that motor. That would work great on a Quark!
    Plays with wood, cardboard, and carpenters glue at home.

    L1 will have to wait until 2013. Oh well.......patience is a lost virtue any-ways...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Back up in the woods
    Posts
    7,557
    Quote Originally Posted by GDJ View Post
    Love the specs on that motor. That would work great on a Quark!
    Yeah, a two-second A! I suspect that these were made in a limited run for FAI competition. You would need to have one very lightweight rocket to have a successful flight with a motor that puts out 0.82 N-s average thrust for over 2 seconds.
    Mark S. Kulka NAR 86134 L1, ASTRE 471, Adirondack Mtns., NY
    Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
    In the forest no one can hear you order a grande caffè misto.
    Warning: I brake for invisible squirrels

  8. #8
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    856
    The AeroTech/Apogee B7 13mm motors were fun but expensive. I once clustered two B7s for 'C' eggloft at a NAR contest in Los Angeles. Dual Copperhead igniters and both worked fine. The model screamed off the pad! Too bad I didn't secure the egg capsule to the booster better because as soon as those two B7s burned out, the egg capsule kept going while the much lighter booster seemed to stop. Out came the parachute for a very low opening altitude. The ejection charges burned through the paper shroud which formed the booster section. Still, pretty cool!

    Apogee also had an C6 motor in 13mm. I still have a few of those around somewhere...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	13mm APOGEE C6 ESTES A3.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	94.8 KB 
ID:	78865  
    Bob

  9. #9
    Join Date
    16th August 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, CANADA
    Posts
    1,888
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkII View Post
    Yeah, a two-second A! I suspect that these were made in a limited run for FAI competition. You would need to have one very lightweight rocket to have a successful flight with a motor that puts out 0.82 N-s average thrust for over 2 seconds.
    My daughters have a few very light rockets that would work.
    Plays with wood, cardboard, and carpenters glue at home.

    L1 will have to wait until 2013. Oh well.......patience is a lost virtue any-ways...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Posts
    1,312
    Quote Originally Posted by Aksrockets View Post
    Dang you got be day dreaming......
    An estes gnome on a C engine!

    Alex
    If you are into the dark side...

    This is a 13mm reloadable full D40. Gets a Gnome to 1000 mph in .4 seconds

    The C20 is 2" shorter.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D40 Lo1.jpg 
Views:	55 
Size:	127.6 KB 
ID:	78869   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	d40d.JPG 
Views:	27 
Size:	25.2 KB 
ID:	78870  

  11. #11
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,513
    i strongly suspect that the ejection charges did not burn through the paper shroud and that the "delay afterburn" or "Hibachi effect" was what burned through the paper shroud. It is HOT and PROLONGED (and did I mention it was HOT??).


    Quote Originally Posted by Initiator001 View Post
    The AeroTech/Apogee B7 13mm motors were fun but expensive. I once clustered two B7s for 'C' eggloft at a NAR contest in Los Angeles. Dual Copperhead igniters and both worked fine. The model screamed off the pad! Too bad I didn't secure the egg capsule to the booster better because as soon as those two B7s burned out, the egg capsule kept going while the much lighter booster seemed to stop. Out came the parachute for a very low opening altitude. The ejection charges burned through the paper shroud which formed the booster section. Still, pretty cool!

    Apogee also had an C6 motor in 13mm. I still have a few of those around somewhere...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    Too far from the event horizon.
    Posts
    701
    I was thinking something ridiculous, like a C-2. I understand about manufacturing cost and marketability.... just wish that weren't so. **heavy sigh**


    Later!

    --Coop

  13. #13
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Back up in the woods
    Posts
    7,557
    There was a company called Green Monkey Aerospace that produced EX motor hardware in a variety of diameters, including 13mm. (Reloadable 13mm motors!) They were in business until quite recently but their website does not seem to exist anymore now.
    Mark S. Kulka NAR 86134 L1, ASTRE 471, Adirondack Mtns., NY
    Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
    In the forest no one can hear you order a grande caffè misto.
    Warning: I brake for invisible squirrels

  14. #14
    Join Date
    29th July 2012
    Location
    Belleville, IL
    Posts
    118
    I'd like to see longer delay times. I have some cluster / multistage designs but RockSim shows them ejecting while still climbing at 30-40m/s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •