Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: AT SU motors.....older....are they safe?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    6th December 2010
    Location
    Central Calif.
    Posts
    122

    AT SU motors.....older....are they safe?

    Came into a recent Original Initiator starter set, and it came with 3 SU motors. Now I know of the crucial nature of black powder motors being stored correctly, and the volitile nature, but I'm curious as to the aging process of these composite units. By the pics it's obvious the blister has yellowed and if the dates are correct.....1994-1989, as actual maunfacture date, not patent date, then are these safe to use? I don;t know the history of how they were stored or otherwise.





    .....

    .....Do I even bother attempting to use these, or play it safe and time capsule these things and purchase new ones? Thanks for your input.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    8th May 2010
    Location
    Winnemucca, NV
    Posts
    238
    Speaking from much expereince, yes, they are safe.

    The only issue you might experience is a shortening of the delay time on the Blue Thunder motor. This could easily be guarded against by using electronics, or you could just go for it.

    Fly 'em.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    23rd January 2009
    Location
    so cal
    Posts
    123
    ive have good luck with older motors as long as they have been kept dry and arent swollen and you cant get the ignitor in also i change out the black powder

  4. #4
    Join Date
    1st July 2011
    Posts
    1,109
    Delays being off a little is the only thing I experienced.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Oviedo, FL
    Posts
    2,471
    Older Aerotech SU motors used a piece of gummed paper (like tape) to hold in the ejection charge. It's common for the charge to have escaped from them. I've built a couple of saucers to use the motors without ejection charges. You could, however, replace the black powder and reseal the top of the motor.

    Also, sometimes the propellant swells up as mentioned. It's difficult to get the igniter (even a small Copperhead) into some new Aerotech SU motors. It's really hard to get them into some old ones.

    The older motors are often harder to ignite. Sometimes, the delay will ignite without the motor lighting, so you get to watch your rocket sit, smoking, on the pad until the ejection charge fires.

    And, there are a few older Aerotech motors that are prone to failure. I got a couple of G38 motors a while back from the same batch and both failed.

    Other than the very slight risk of a motor failing, however, as long as you make sure the ejection charge is intact, there's no safety issues using the older motors.

    -- Roger

  6. #6
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,865
    Send them to me for flight testing-I'll certify them and send them back...
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    23rd January 2009
    Location
    Littleton, Colorado
    Posts
    1,101
    I just used some that judging from the price tag were older than yours. Just carefully collect all the loose powder, pour it back in, tape it up, clean the residue off the copperhead and let er rip! Like any AT motor account for a possible bonus delay.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    857
    The E15, F25 and F50 motor are on blister cards where the blister was heat sealed to the card. As long as the blister does not have any openings in it for air to enter, there is no concern about propellant swelling or other environmental issues (Unless the adhesive on the tape disk over the ejection charge has let go).

    Hmm, I wonder if I was the one who packaged these motors...
    Bob

  9. #9
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,865
    Hi Bob- thanks for not using staples!
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    23rd January 2009
    Location
    Littleton, Colorado
    Posts
    1,101
    The old ones I used were still very tightly packaged, had to work hard to get it open, and once you did you could "smell the 80's."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    525
    I've used AT SU motors this old, the only issue being very hard to light White Lightning. Blue Thunder loads this old have lit fine for me.
    Paul
    NAR #87246 L1 - Section #558 - www.wooshrocketry.org
    "If we weren't all crazy, we would go insane" - Jimmy Buffett

  12. #12
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Savannnah, Ga
    Posts
    3,422
    Old motors are what saucers are for.

    If they go boom....no great loss or minimum damage.
    If delay is off..... no worries.

    So windy days + old motors+ saucers = good clean fun!
    Jim Hendricksen
    L-3 Tripoli 9693 Tap
    ICBM Orangeburg SC
    QCRS Princeton ILL
    MDRA Price Maryland
    Woosh Bong Wisconsin
    "Made" member of Chicago Rocket Mafia
    Rocketry...........an exact science.......but not exactly !!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    Pottstown, PA.
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by J Blatz View Post
    Speaking from much expereince, yes, they are safe.

    The only issue you might experience is a shortening of the delay time on the Blue Thunder motor.
    Fly 'em.
    Actually, that F50 looks to be from the pre-Blue Thunder days, so it should just be the "classic" AT propellant.
    Justin Gleiter
    TRA# 2898 L3
    MDRA

  14. #14
    Join Date
    21st February 2011
    Location
    Tuleta, Tx
    Posts
    3,365
    I burned an old F25 a while back, it chuffed a bit and there was some bonus on the delay. It was still cool.
    Jeff Vegh
    TRA# 03011
    NAR# 92403

  15. #15
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    1,547
    Are those Econojet motors the one's known as E-CATO-Jets? I know there were two versions. The one's that didn't explode and the ones that did
    "Isn't gravity a funny thing?" - Todd Rundgren

  16. #16
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by dave carver View Post
    Are those Econojet motors the one's known as E-CATO-Jets? I know there were two versions. The one's that didn't explode and the ones that did
    The F20W's were generally fine for the most part.

    It was mostly the G35W that had problems. I had 3 of those things CATO back to back.
    Donald Besaw Jr.
    TRA#9876 L2
    www.flashrocketry.com

  17. #17
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Oviedo, FL
    Posts
    2,471
    Quote Originally Posted by blackjack2564 View Post
    Old motors are what saucers are for.

    If they go boom....no great loss or minimum damage.
    If delay is off..... no worries.
    If the ejection charge is msissing ... all the better! :-)

    A couple of years ago, I made a paper saucer with a 24mm motor mount that I flew to use up some old E-15 motors that had lost their ejection charges. It was inexpensive and a lot of fun.

    -- Roger

  18. #18
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    857
    Quote Originally Posted by dave carver View Post
    Are those Econojet motors the one's known as E-CATO-Jets? I know there were two versions. The one's that didn't explode and the ones that did
    If the Econojet F20s have a date code of '902417' then DON'T fly them!
    Bob

  19. #19
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by Initiator001 View Post
    If the Econojet F20s have a date code of '902417' then DON'T fly them!
    Is that the day you left?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    15th February 2012
    Location
    Merritt Island, Florida
    Posts
    692
    I recently went through my stash of old AT motors from around 1996. The two loose motors wouldn't light at all, I gave up after three ignitors. Ended up soaking them in water and throwing them away.

    The two sealed econojet packs worked, after difficult ignitor installs all four engines huffed and chuffed for several seconds before doing their thing - excellent flights and spot on ejection charge.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    10th October 2010
    Location
    Erie Colorado
    Posts
    383
    Unlike black powder, soaking composite motors in water does nothing to deactivate them. Synthetic rubber won't be phased by the water. What was probably preventing ignition was surface oxidation. That's difficult to overcome in a core burning motor that's ignited from the top of the grain.

    IIRC, the correct way to dispose of composite motors is to disassemble them (yes, even single use,) and set up a controlled burn of the grain.

    Quote Originally Posted by neond7 View Post
    I recently went through my stash of old AT motors from around 1996. The two loose motors wouldn't light at all, I gave up after three ignitors. Ended up soaking them in water and throwing them away.

    The two sealed econojet packs worked, after difficult ignitor installs all four engines huffed and chuffed for several seconds before doing their thing - excellent flights and spot on ejection charge.
    Peter Olivola

  22. #22
    Join Date
    20th January 2011
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Posts
    3,064
    I burned some old E,s and they were fine. The hardest part was figuring out how to seal the top without getting tape between the casing and the MMT. Just to make sure the disk did not come loose.

    Jeff Gortatowsky
    Redondo Beach, CA. NAR 70988 Level 2
    2013 Stats: Flights: 44
    Approximate Total Total Impulse: 5,648Ns (Equivalent to a 10% M motor.)
    Approx. Average Cost per flight: $13.23USD
    Approx. (Not necessarily what I paid) Total RETAIL Cost: $582USD

    Link will take you to: About me, The Flights, and The Fleet

    --------------------
    "(Scientific) Skepticism is not a set of beliefs, it is a set of methods for asking questions about reality." -- Doctor Steven Novella

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •