Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33

Thread: Propellent weight & Haz Mat

  1. #1
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660

    Propellent weight & Haz Mat

    Can any number of individual propellent grains weighing a max 30 grams or less be shipped via the US Postal Service without a Haz Mat charge?
    The process is continuous...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    11th December 2010
    Location
    Between the topsoil and the sun. A surface dweller.
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros View Post
    Can any number of individual propellent grains weighing a max 30 grams or less be shipped via the US Postal Service without a Haz Mat charge?
    Yes, however you must be a shipper on USPS list. Not just anyone can ship..(my understanding)

    It is still hazmat, even though there is no fee associated...

    however, you are limited to the total weight, which means you would be better off to ship 2 boxes.(thats a lot of motors..)

    "Dad, I am going to put a big motor in this skinny rocket... its going to disapear like a ghost!!!.....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    8,133
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros View Post
    Can any number of individual propellent grains weighing a max 30 grams or less be shipped via the US Postal Service without a Haz Mat charge?
    That's what I was told by Ken at Performance Hobbies. As long as any one grain doesn't exceed 30 grams, there is no hazmat fee, regardless of quantity. It specifies on his website which reloads and SU motors require hazmat, and which ones don't.
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post

    That's what I was told by Ken at Performance Hobbies. As long as any one grain doesn't exceed 30 grams, there is no hazmat fee, regardless of quantity. It specifies on his website which reloads and SU motors require hazmat, and which ones don't.

    Ok, that's what I thought.

    Thrust curve, www.thrustcurve.org shows the propellent weight of the motor I'm looking at, Cesaroni 24 mm 73F30-6A, as 40 grams. If the propellenet is a single grain weighing 40 grams I can see why there is a haz mat fee.

    But...

    Performance Hobbies lists the motor I am looking at, cesaroni 24 mm 78F30-6A, as a 3 grain motor. 40 grams divided by 3 is 13.3 grams per grain. That's a lot less then the 30 gram shipping limit per grain.

    The question is... what's the deal?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BLU-97B 001.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	76.3 KB 
ID:	69751   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BLU-97B 003.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	86.0 KB 
ID:	69752  
    The process is continuous...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    11th December 2010
    Location
    Between the topsoil and the sun. A surface dweller.
    Posts
    2,248
    ALL CTI requires hazmat fee.

    they are not approved for USPS shipment, i believe. They can go UPS, but they carge a 35.00 fee now.(ups not the vendors or cti)

    thats the way i understand it... CTI did not get the exemption for USPS shipments.

    AT 29mm High power are the only hazmat free i know of. And some of them are not hazmat free.


    (dumbed down)
    the motor may not require hazmat, but no one got it approved to ship by USPS, so its shipped by UPS, which charges a fee for any rocket motor.

    "Dad, I am going to put a big motor in this skinny rocket... its going to disapear like a ghost!!!.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660
    Quote Originally Posted by ClayD View Post

    ALL CTI requires hazmat fee.

    they are not approved for USPS shipment, i believe. They can go UPS, but they carge a 35.00 fee now.(ups not the vendors or cti)

    thats the way i understand it... CTI did not get the exemption for USPS shipments.

    AT 29mm High power are the only hazmat free i know of. And some of them are not hazmat free.


    (dumbed down)
    the motor may not require hazmat, but no one got it approved to ship by USPS, so its shipped by UPS, which charges a fee for any rocket motor.

    Well crap!

    Is CTI working on correcting their oversight anytime in the near future?
    The process is continuous...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    8,133
    This is a guess, and only a guess, but could it be that CTI grains are in a plastic housing and AT grains are packed loose in a bag?
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  8. #8
    troj's Avatar
    troj is online now Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,650
    I believe how it's packaged plays into whether or not USPS will allow it to be shipped or not.

    I know it affects DOT requirements.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  9. #9
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post

    This is a guess, and only a guess, but could it be that CTI grains are in a plastic housing and AT grains are packed loose in a bag?
    Quote Originally Posted by troj View Post

    I believe how it's packaged plays into whether or not USPS will allow it to be shipped or not.

    I know it affects DOT requirements.

    -Kevin

    With money to be made, you'd think any problems would be worked until corrected.
    The process is continuous...

  10. #10
    troj's Avatar
    troj is online now Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,650
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros View Post
    With money to be made, you'd think any problems would be worked until corrected.
    Keep in mind that changing the packaging would require changing their instructions, packaging, and who knows what else?

    The question is how that will compare to the impact on sales. That's something I cannot even begin to hazard a guess on.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  11. #11
    Join Date
    1st July 2011
    Posts
    1,130
    CTI's money was made off the simplicity of building the reloads. One step.

    Breaking it into grains for shipping and reassembling would make them closer to the market Aerotech already has. Makes business sense to keep their model if that is what worked for them.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660
    Quote Originally Posted by troj View Post

    Keep in mind that changing the packaging would require changing their instructions, packaging, and who knows what else?

    The question is how that will compare to the impact on sales. That's something I cannot even begin to hazard a guess on.

    -Kevin

    I would think not having to pay a $35 Haz mat fee per order, sales could only improve. Improve enough that changing their instructions, packaging, and who knows what else would be worth the investment.

    After all, they are already making the product.
    The process is continuous...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    8,133
    One of the allures of CTI motors is their easy, almost foolproof, assembly. Maybe if they changed to loose grains, they'd loose some or all of that benefit. It could also be that when CTI motors first came out, there was no hazmat fee. I know I didn't pay a fee when I ordered my first CTI reloads.
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Location
    Northern Maine
    Posts
    1,201
    From what I saw in the Apogee video, a 29mm Cesaroni motor could be disassembled into: liner and nozzle, delay element, and the grains. Each grain could be in a separate bag. All you would have to add to assembly would be simply inserting each grain into the liner. Not that hard. You already have to remove the delay element to adjust the time, so how much harder can it be to slip a couple of grains in while you have it off?
    Total Impulse for 2013: 738 N... A 15.3% J
    A:0, B:0, C:0, D:0, E:0, F:0, G:0, H:4, I:0
    Total Impulse for 2012: 1293 N... D:2, E:1, F:2, G:4, H:4
    Total Impulse for 2011: 945 N... A:4, B:5, C:13, D:4, E:7, F:5

  15. #15
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    Opelika, Al
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by ClayD View Post
    ALL CTI requires hazmat fee.

    they are not approved for USPS shipment, i believe. They can go UPS, but they carge a 35.00 fee now.(ups not the vendors or cti)

    thats the way i understand it... CTI did not get the exemption for USPS shipments.

    AT 29mm High power are the only hazmat free i know of. And some of them are not hazmat free.


    (dumbed down)
    the motor may not require hazmat, but no one got it approved to ship by USPS, so its shipped by UPS, which charges a fee for any rocket motor.
    Hazmat via fedex went up to $27.50, not $35


    Chris
    Christopher Short
    TRA #10247 L3 TAP
    NAR #83000 L3CC
    Prefect #38
    www.csrocketry.com
    850-554-6531

  16. #16
    Join Date
    19th November 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post
    This is a guess, and only a guess, but could it be that CTI grains are in a plastic housing and AT grains are packed loose in a bag?
    Yes.

    The solution is to buy at the launch if you want to save on shipping, or buy in bulk online and pay shipping for a discount per motor.
    Last edited by New Ocean; 27th January 2012 at 12:46 AM.

  17. #17
    troj's Avatar
    troj is online now Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,650
    HazMat is nothing new -- it has been around since well before CTI started making hobby motors.

    BTW, not all CTI loads are as simple as just dropping grains into the liner -- a number of them (no, I don't know how many) have small o-rings in between the grains.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  18. #18
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Location
    Salem, MA
    Posts
    3,279
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros View Post
    Can any number of individual propellent grains weighing a max 30 grams or less be shipped via the US Postal Service without a Haz Mat charge?
    No. Not unless all the following requirements are met.
    • The motors must meet certain USPS specificatiojns and be apporved by the USPS in writing
    • The individual needs to be approved by the USPS in writing
    • Approvals must be renewed annually in writing
    • The motors or propellant grains must be individually package per USPS specifications
    • No indiividual package can contain more than 30 grams of propellant
    • The individual packages must be overpacked securely in a fiberboard box
    • he total weight mailed in each fiberboard box must not exceed 25 poundsl
    • Each box must be marked "Toy Propellant Devices, Handle With Care" and "Surface Mail Only"
    http://www.nar.org/pdf/shipping_rocket_motors.pdf


  19. #19
    Join Date
    1st July 2011
    Posts
    1,130
    I use Aerotech because they are cheaper on the reloads. CTI advertised how much easier they are and that is true. Since I have no issues with AT - building them for years, I seen no reason to switch.

    Many people first getting into rocketry choose CTI for that reason. Considered fool proof for a Level 1 cert. Still very simple. If they look like a bag of parts like AT, then that might go away.

    That or they established enough of a name to get away with it by now.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    East Louisa, Va
    Posts
    113
    For example, the Aerotech G64W used to be a single 62.5 gram grain, and couldn't (or shouldn't - I don't remember always paying a fee) be shipped USPS.
    Now, it is listed as 60 grams propellant weight and is split into two separate 30 gram grains which the user tapes together aligning the igniter slots.
    The total impulse dropped from 120 to 112 NewtonSeconds, but they can be shipped USPS.
    This is done with some of the red and green reloads as well.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Back up in the woods
    Posts
    7,575
    Quote Originally Posted by atticus View Post
    For example, the Aerotech G64W used to be a single 62.5 gram grain, and couldn't (or shouldn't - I don't remember always paying a fee) be shipped USPS.
    Now, it is listed as 60 grams propellant weight and is split into two separate 30 gram grains which the user tapes together aligning the igniter slots.
    The total impulse dropped from 120 to 112 NewtonSeconds, but they can be shipped USPS.
    This is done with some of the red and green reloads as well.
    AeroTech calls them "bifurcated" reloads, I believe. The F40W reload for the RMS 29/40-120 still features a grain that is similar in size to the old G64 reloads: one long propellant slug. It is a wonderful reload but if ordered online it incurs a Hazmat fee, which is a notorious hassle for that popular MPR motor in particular. Heck, even the black powder Estes E9 must be shipped by common carrier and will require payment of the fee because each one contains 35.8 grams of propellant. The one saving grace is that you only pay one fee for an entire box, so if you order in bulk the cost of the fee can be spread out over multiple motors.
    Mark S. Kulka NAR 86134 L1, ASTRE 471, Adirondack Mtns., NY
    Opinions Unfettered by Logic • Advice Unsullied by Erudition • Rocketry Without Pity
    In the forest no one can hear you order a grande caffè misto.
    Warning: I brake for invisible squirrels

  22. #22
    Join Date
    15th April 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, TN
    Posts
    377
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros

    Well crap!

    Is CTI working on correcting their oversight anytime in the near future?
    Is it a CTI problem? The USPS exemption is secured by the online retailer, not CTI the manufacturer. CTI reloads violate the "30 gram" rule, but to change that CTI would have to change the company from the business model down to the packaging. They built their business on being the easy reload, one piece, screw it in, fly it, screw it out, throw it away. I can't see them changing that

    Another thing to bear in mind, CTI isn't even an American company. When it ships to vendors it is via Canadian post and could go to any country in which they have distributors each of which has their own shipping regulations.
    Chris Dondanville
    NAR #93266 L2
    TRA #13242 L3
    Prefect Phoenix Missile Works (#81 Birmingham)
    NAR Advisor Music City Missile Club (#589 Nashville)

    email me

  23. #23
    Join Date
    13th February 2009
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    3,660
    Quote Originally Posted by cdondanville View Post

    Is it a CTI problem? The USPS exemption is secured by the online retailer, not CTI the manufacturer. CTI reloads violate the "30 gram" rule, but to change that CTI would have to change the company from the business model down to the packaging. They built their business on being the easy reload, one piece, screw it in, fly it, screw it out, throw it away. I can't see them changing that

    Another thing to bear in mind, CTI isn't even an American company. When it ships to vendors it is via Canadian post and could go to any country in which they have distributors each of which has their own shipping regulations.

    In what manner is this information useful to USA consumers that dislike paying Haz Mat fees for low and mid powerd reloads.

    "Change the company", I hardly think so.
    The process is continuous...

  24. #24
    troj's Avatar
    troj is online now Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potentate of Perilous Pans
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    11,650
    It would require changes, not "to the company", but to their manufacturing process, which may have significant cost. At the very least, it would mean changing their packaging, which I believe is part of their DOT approvals, and may well incur additional cost there, as well.

    So, let's say it costs $5,000 to implement such changes. Will they gain sufficient additional sales over the next three years, over what they get without such changes, to recoup that expense? It's all about ROI, and companies typically want to see a positive ROI in three years, or less. Lots of projects I've worked on have to show an ROI in a year or less in order to get approved.

    -Kevin
    Rocketry Online - Your Global Rocketry Resource
    Info-Central Rocketry Tips & Techniques
    Rocketry Ramblings

  25. #25
    Join Date
    29th December 2011
    Posts
    565
    I believe many of the CTI reloads use a pyrodex pellet to aid ignition. That might change things, compared to other reloads.

    Gerald

  26. #26
    Join Date
    19th January 2009
    Location
    Opelika, Al
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by cdondanville View Post
    Is it a CTI problem? The USPS exemption is secured by the online retailer, not CTI the manufacturer. CTI reloads violate the "30 gram" rule, but to change that CTI would have to change the company from the business model down to the packaging. They built their business on being the easy reload, one piece, screw it in, fly it, screw it out, throw it away. I can't see them changing that

    Another thing to bear in mind, CTI isn't even an American company. When it ships to vendors it is via Canadian post and could go to any country in which they have distributors each of which has their own shipping regulations.
    CTI shipments go via freight, not canadian post.
    Christopher Short
    TRA #10247 L3 TAP
    NAR #83000 L3CC
    Prefect #38
    www.csrocketry.com
    850-554-6531

  27. #27
    Join Date
    15th April 2011
    Location
    Spring Hill, TN
    Posts
    377
    Quote Originally Posted by bradycros

    In what manner is this information useful to USA consumers that dislike paying Haz Mat fees for low and mid powerd reloads.

    "Change the company", I hardly think so.
    And because you don't like paying a hazmat fee, how is that a "CTI oversight"?

    The point I was making is that CTI made a decision the build their business around being the flier friendly reload. That decision came with certain implications that include hazmat fees for some reloads that it could possibly be avoided on and slightly higher cost reloads overall (due to the assembly labor.). For them to suddenly start shipping reloads as bags of parts they would lose that differentiation. They lose that then they have to change strategy as well as execution in manufacturing, packaging and shipping, hence my change the company comment. So in addition to changing documentation, packaging materials and machines and the associated business processes they also have to come up with their new identity. When I have to assemble the motor in the field, and not just screw in the reload, they are no longer "the easy one."
    Chris Dondanville
    NAR #93266 L2
    TRA #13242 L3
    Prefect Phoenix Missile Works (#81 Birmingham)
    NAR Advisor Music City Missile Club (#589 Nashville)

    email me

  28. #28
    Join Date
    10th November 2011
    Location
    Northeastern Maryland
    Posts
    779
    I will continue to take my motors in what are primarily drop in liners, thank you very much. No desire to see it changed to a bag of parts. I don't pay hazmat shipping fees for any motor. I either buy them at launches or have my local hobby shop special order them for me along with other hazardous stuff they get in. The idea to totally change the concept behind a motor to save a $20-30/BOX fee just doesn't cut the mustard. Hell, if you are ordering a few J's, K's, and L's the HAZMAT fee is likely less than you would pay in sales tax.

    There is an easy solution to this problem:
    -Buy AT if you like to assemble a motor (o-rings and all), not pay a per box hazmat shipping fee, and likely pay a little less for the load.
    -Buy CTI if you want something simple and aren't having stuff shipped to you or don't care what it costs.
    -James Hamilton
    L2
    https://sites.google.com/site/disasterguysrocketry/
    I love America but I also love Canadian bacon, whiskey, and MOTORS.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Location
    Salem, MA
    Posts
    3,279
    Quote Originally Posted by G_T View Post
    I believe many of the CTI reloads use a pyrodex pellet to aid ignition. That might change things, compared to other reloads.

    Gerald
    It's black powder, not Pyrodex(R), but it doesn't change anything.

    Bob

  30. #30
    Join Date
    20th January 2009
    Location
    Salem, MA
    Posts
    3,279
    If you dont want to pay a hazmat fee, get a group of guys to go in on a group puirchase of 30 CTI motors.

    The hazmat fee is $27.50 or less than a $1 per motor. I'll bet most on;lime vendors will eat the haznmat fee and probably the shipping fee for this size order.

    Anoither option is fo order from a vendor like Wildman. Join the club and save a coupe of bucks per motor of $60 on 30 motors. Cost to join is $30. Cost of hazmat fee is $27.50. You still save $2.50.

    Or buy the motors from your local CTI distributor.

    Bob

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •