Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Krushnic effect

  1. #1
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,877

    Krushnic effect

    Tapping the hive mind here. I just finished machining out of very cool tailcone for a 2.5 body that is only 1.0" long with about a 2:1 rounded taper. The whole idea was to sink an Aeropack retainer cap in in and thread the same after loading. Tailcone and Aeropack to be bonded with JB. A little nagging doubt finally bloomed in the small part of my pea brain not occupied by Albert Ziemer. The exhaust is recessed by about .70" from the outer edge of the tailcone. Exit dims are .70 deep by approx 30mm. My questions are these:
    1) will this reduce the effectiveness of any chosen motor?
    2) Does this affect what propellant I should fly? I wanted long burn 29mm Cez motors, but now am I doomed to V-max?
    3) lacking any other papers I could find that state "...deeper than one body diameter..." is there any research papers out there I can see that documents a deteriorating airflow turbulence problem as depth increases x and thrust goes to 0?
    The rear face is flat and 2.0" in dia. and I was hoping the boundary layer would leave in a little better flow than just a big open wound at the back end.
    4) should I just open up the back end a little?
    Haven't bonded anything yet- I could just chalk this up as another fun day in the dungeon.
    Last edited by fyrwrxz; 4th January 2012 at 10:48 PM.
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    19th November 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    846
    No math or simulations, but under 1 inch doesn't seem likely to cause any problems. If you want long burn motors, the rocket mass is going to dominate here. (The rocket is thin, and that tailcone does not sound very deep.) My only experience with this matter is extreme cases such as fully enclosed rack rockets and 2 stage rockets with recessed upper stage motors. These are smaller (BP) rockets with motors 1 or more diameters into the airframe.
    Last edited by New Ocean; 4th January 2012 at 11:11 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,877
    Thanks! I'm starting to feel a little better now...just maybe over-thougtht it a little.
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    848
    As I remember, the rule of thumb to avoid the Krushnik effect is to recess the motor no more than on caliber inside the body.
    Dick Stafford
    The Original Rocket Dungeon
    Volunteer compiler of product news for ROCKETS Magazine

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th May 2011
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    653
    Over 40 years ago I did a science fair project on the Krushnik effect. I sure wish I still had all of the results and so forth. I built a little motor test stand with an electric motor, coffee can and springs. It produced real nice thrust/time curves just like you see in the catalogs. But back to the original question I think rs3 is right, you have to go more than 1 motor diameter deep before it makes much difference.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    18th October 2011
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    297
    The Krushnic effect is a plus for rockets that are meant to fly low and slow.

    Really low and slow.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    848
    If you are a fan of the Krushnik Effect, you might want to try the Bernoulli Lock. Get a large diameter rocket (try a 4" er) with the motor recessed in the body (one caliber NOT required), and set it on a flat thrust plate. The motor thrust will create a low pressure area below the rocket and it will be sucked onto the thrust plate. Toasty! (But you will win closest to the pad.)

    A photo of my accidental experiment can be found here.
    Dick Stafford
    The Original Rocket Dungeon
    Volunteer compiler of product news for ROCKETS Magazine

  8. #8
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,877
    Not to worry, boys- the next one will feature the Kamm effect!
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th July 2009
    Location
    CA and VT
    Posts
    344
    Bernoulli Lock in effect on this used-to-be beautiful saturn 5. It got stuck to the pad for roughly 4/6 of a second by my shutter count, and melted through the plastic shrouds, making the fins all wobbly and sucking up the majority of the thrust.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	305093_10150307106518220_683878219_8050439_1298521616_n.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	34.9 KB 
ID:	67199  
    In space, no one can hear your shutter click.

    LUNAR and CRMRC L1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    848
    Quote Originally Posted by Lentamental View Post
    Bernoulli Lock in effect on this used-to-be beautiful saturn 5. It got stuck to the pad for roughly 4/6 of a second by my shutter count, and melted through the plastic shrouds, making the fins all wobbly and sucking up the majority of the thrust.
    Ouch! My Archer stuck for the entire burn of the G35. That was the end of the North Coast by Estes plastic ring and the lower BT. Luckily, the fins survived.
    Dick Stafford
    The Original Rocket Dungeon
    Volunteer compiler of product news for ROCKETS Magazine

  11. #11
    Join Date
    17th June 2011
    Location
    The fertile fields of Malta, IL
    Posts
    918
    My NCR Lance Beta stuck to the pad once. I don't recall the motor, but I had a bunch of extended family there watching a couple of launches and the LB was gonna be the grand finale. It sure was! Roasted on the pad and then blew the laundry

    Fortunately, I had ditched the plastic rings for plywood and built the entire rocket with Titebond II yellow glue. So, the butt's a little charred and the rocket's is too

    Now I use a rail for it instead of lugs that had too much paint in them.
    Adrian
    Last edited by jd2cylman; 7th January 2012 at 01:46 AM.
    Adrian Butler
    jd2cylman@mchsidotcom
    NAR 73787 L2
    Tripoli 13524 L2
    QCRS, Princeton, IL

  12. #12
    Join Date
    31st December 2011
    Posts
    10
    faced sam eproblem while launching,trying to use diffrent tech will discuss ...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •