Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 91 to 105 of 105

Thread: The Carbon Daddy...

  1. #91
    Join Date
    6th February 2010
    Location
    Camarillo, CA
    Posts
    1,828
    Nosecone still go on? It's hard to tell from the photo.
    Bryce
    KJ6TEC
    NAR L2
    TRA L2
    Current Projects: 5x Madcow Squat (L3).

    Flying: 75mm Min Dia Research Project, BaddAzz Rocketry Das Blitzkrieg, The Mega Mean Machine!,"Size Matters", HPR Pemtech King Kraken,

    2011: 14,773Ns (44% N)
    2012: 38,670Ns (89% O) (Goal is 44%O, Goal met!)

    Read about our College rocket project www.Project60k.com

  2. #92
    Join Date
    1st April 2011
    Location
    Utah / UROC
    Posts
    2,344
    Quote Originally Posted by bandman444 View Post
    Nosecone still go on? It's hard to tell from the photo.
    It does. With a little room for NC weight.

    Alex
    Scratch Build!
    Subscribe to my Youtube Channel!
    NAR 93498
    TRA 14188
    NAR Jr. L1
    TRA Jr. Flier
    2013 motors: I:2, J:1

  3. #93
    Join Date
    1st April 2011
    Location
    Utah / UROC
    Posts
    2,344
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocketbuilder View Post
    Maybe I'll build me a Big Daddy with a red nose cone and fins, and cover the BT with CF pattern Monokote.
    Yours looks great!
    Don't cheat! I might be able to make you a tube some time. I have a little left over CF and extra BT.

    Alex
    Scratch Build!
    Subscribe to my Youtube Channel!
    NAR 93498
    TRA 14188
    NAR Jr. L1
    TRA Jr. Flier
    2013 motors: I:2, J:1

  4. #94
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    7,965
    Did I miss what you did for retention? Has this flown yet?
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    1st April 2011
    Location
    Utah / UROC
    Posts
    2,344
    Nope, Hasn't flown quite yet. I'm running a little short on money for 54mm motors this year, but I am planning on selling some stuff. Hopefully that'll balance out the budget a little better. I want to fly this at LDRS on the J1055 Vmax. I've also got a 1G 38mm motor in my motor box.

    Retention is just a friction fit and masking tape.

    Alex
    Scratch Build!
    Subscribe to my Youtube Channel!
    NAR 93498
    TRA 14188
    NAR Jr. L1
    TRA Jr. Flier
    2013 motors: I:2, J:1

  6. #96
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    7,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Aksrockets View Post
    Nope, Hasn't flown quite yet. I'm running a little short on money for 54mm motors this year, but I am planning on selling some stuff. Hopefully that'll balance out the budget a little better. I want to fly this at LDRS on the J1055 Vmax. I've also got a 1G 38mm motor in my motor box.

    Retention is just a friction fit and masking tape.

    Alex
    Friction fit? You are a braver man than I, sir!
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    25th August 2009
    Location
    Carol Stream
    Posts
    1,359
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post
    Friction fit? You are a braver man than I, sir!

    People (I have) have flown N motors (and bigger-not me) in 70 pound rockets with friction fit. Its really nothing to be afraid of.
    L3-TRA 12636
    QCRS BOD/Prefect. Princeton, IL
    TWA Bong, WI
    Chicago Rocket Mafia "The Hot Tub"
    Public Enemy Aerospace
    Beep-Beep-Boop-Boop

  8. #98
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    7,965
    Quote Originally Posted by GRIFFIN View Post
    People (I have) have flown N motors (and bigger-not me) in 70 pound rockets with friction fit. Its really nothing to be afraid of.
    I prefer positive retention in all sizes of my rockets. One less thing for me to worry about.
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    21st February 2011
    Location
    Tuleta, Tx
    Posts
    3,354
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post
    I prefer positive retention in all sizes of my rockets. One less thing for me to worry about.
    I'm with you, I hate to lose a $30 casing much less a $200 one. I know I would feel horrible if a rocket I launched kicked a motor that conked somebody on the head.
    Jeff Vegh
    TRA# 03011
    NAR# 92403

  10. #100
    Join Date
    25th August 2009
    Location
    Carol Stream
    Posts
    1,359
    Quote Originally Posted by JPVegh View Post
    I'm with you, I hate to lose a $30 casing much less a $200 one. I know I would feel horrible if a rocket I launched kicked a motor that conked somebody on the head.
    Shock cord attached to the forward bulkhead of the motor pretty much assures that will not happen. Don't get me wrong. I use Aeropak retainers whenever possible. Some applications do not allow (minimum diameter).
    L3-TRA 12636
    QCRS BOD/Prefect. Princeton, IL
    TWA Bong, WI
    Chicago Rocket Mafia "The Hot Tub"
    Public Enemy Aerospace
    Beep-Beep-Boop-Boop

  11. #101
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    7,965
    Quote Originally Posted by GRIFFIN View Post
    Shock cord attached to the forward bulkhead of the motor pretty much assures that will not happen. Don't get me wrong. I use Aeropak retainers whenever possible. Some applications do not allow (minimum diameter).
    Aeropack has a device for minimum diameter retention.

    http://aeropack.net/min_dia_retainers.asp
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    26th January 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    7,965
    Quote Originally Posted by JPVegh View Post
    I'm with you, I hate to lose a $30 casing much less a $200 one. I know I would feel horrible if a rocket I launched kicked a motor that conked somebody on the head.
    Or broke somebody's windshield.
    NAR 91107, Level 2

    I think paint and I have an uneasy truce going.

  13. #103
    Join Date
    24th January 2009
    Location
    Somewhere, Kuwait
    Posts
    8,317
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post
    Aeropack has a device for minimum diameter retention.

    http://aeropack.net/min_dia_retainers.asp
    I have used them and like them.
    -----------------------
    Chuck Haislip
    NAR/Tripoli Level 3

    Level 1 - LOC Minie Magg; Level 2 - PR Broken Arrow;
    Level 3 - 10 inch Nike Smoke
    Ns for Year: 0 on hiatus serving our GREAT country in Kuwait
    My rockets usually fly naked. If they survive, they earn their paint.

    Come fly with ROSCO or ICBM in Orangeburg SC => http://rocketrysouthcarolina.com

  14. #104
    Join Date
    20th August 2011
    Location
    Windsor, Connecticut
    Posts
    2,186
    Quote Originally Posted by Aksrockets View Post
    little short on money
    Really? A LITTLE? Really?

  15. #105
    Join Date
    1st April 2011
    Location
    Utah / UROC
    Posts
    2,344
    Quote Originally Posted by qquake2k View Post
    Friction fit? You are a braver man than I, sir!
    Well, Since I left a good portion of the aft MMT tube exposed, I can get a good amount of tape wrapped around there and since I have access to the front of the MMT tube as well, I can wrap tape around the front of the motor to the front of the motor tube. I've friction fitted almost every HPR motor I've flown without a problem.

    Alex
    Scratch Build!
    Subscribe to my Youtube Channel!
    NAR 93498
    TRA 14188
    NAR Jr. L1
    TRA Jr. Flier
    2013 motors: I:2, J:1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •