Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Problem...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    20th September 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    166

    Problem...

    I've been spending my afternoon designing a scale rocket of the soviet "Dvina" SAM missile, but I've run into a bit of a problem.

    See, the missile has a short section at the bottom (about 1/5 of the length of the rocket) that is larger in diameter than the rest of the rocket. This presents a problem in the way of launch lugs. I've attached the .ork of my design if you need to see it.

    Any solutions? Or will this have to be the second attempt at scaling a soviet missile I've had to scrap? (I started with the Topol ICBM before noticing it had no fins. I can see the conversation that would have made with the RSO now...)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SA-2_Guideline_S-75_low_%20to_high_altitude_ground-to-air_missile_system_on_truck_Russia_Russian.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	42.9 KB 
ID:	66117  
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Location
    Northern Maine
    Posts
    1,187
    You can't simulate it in OR, but you could put the lug on a bit 1/4 wide wood that extends out so they are in a straight line. It won't be perfectly to scale, but it will work.
    Total Impulse for 2013: 169 N... An 11% H
    A:0, B:0, C:0, D:0, E:0, F:0, G:0, H:1, I:0
    Total Impulse for 2012: 1293 N... D:2, E:1, F:2, G:4, H:4
    Total Impulse for 2011: 945 N... A:4, B:5, C:13, D:4, E:7, F:5

  3. #3
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Location
    San Diego. CA.
    Posts
    2,880
    Hey Doc! Not elegant by any means. but if the fins are in alignment, you could go to the base (fillet) of the bottom fin put a lug there and run a line to the upper fins to attach a short (aerodynamically faired) lug on the fin spaced away from the body tube by the lower dimension. FWIW
    Last edited by fyrwrxz; 27th December 2011 at 01:43 AM.
    All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental-Vonnegut
    97% of the time, I'm right-the other 5% doesn't bother me.
    There comes a point in your life that looks just like all the other points you didn't notice either.
    If I had a nickel for every dollar I spent on rockets, I'd have more rockets.
    You may have had more fun in your life than me, but the chaos was undeniable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    2nd May 2011
    Location
    Frisco/Plano TX
    Posts
    2,572
    Mount the upper lug externally--mount the lower one internally--easier than it sounds. I'm doing something similar on my stealth-ceptor build.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th June 2011
    Location
    Florida USA
    Posts
    1,454
    I don't always fly rockets,... But when I do, I get them back. (The most interesting man in the world TV commercial voice)

    Fleet...35
    Estes...6
    scratch-build...29
    Lost...2
    Crashed...5
    Splash-Downs...1
    Most prized...Saturn V
    Total-launched...125(+- 10 or so)
    -My-Rockets-Thread-

  6. #6
    Join Date
    2nd May 2011
    Location
    Frisco/Plano TX
    Posts
    2,572
    159 has the idea

  7. #7
    Join Date
    27th June 2011
    Location
    Florida USA
    Posts
    1,454
    The driver hit ''submit reply'' before me....! ( I was looking up links!)
    yes good idea.
    I don't always fly rockets,... But when I do, I get them back. (The most interesting man in the world TV commercial voice)

    Fleet...35
    Estes...6
    scratch-build...29
    Lost...2
    Crashed...5
    Splash-Downs...1
    Most prized...Saturn V
    Total-launched...125(+- 10 or so)
    -My-Rockets-Thread-

  8. #8
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Location
    Southwestern USA
    Posts
    72

    Smile Options

    There are fly-away launch lugs that would work. It would also go without launch lugs in a launch tower.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    20th September 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by [POW]Eagle159 View Post
    I think I'll do that. It'll still stick out the tube, though, but it isn't much, and it's not a problem for me. As long as it goes UP, and not LEFT, RIGHT, or if a portal to hell opens up beneath it, DOWN. (Hey, it MIGHT be possible... There's no definitive proof that it can't summon a portal to hell...)

    Thanks!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Needville, TX and Shiner, TX
    Posts
    6,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Quigley View Post
    I've been spending my afternoon designing a scale rocket of the soviet "Dvina" SAM missile, but I've run into a bit of a problem.

    See, the missile has a short section at the bottom (about 1/5 of the length of the rocket) that is larger in diameter than the rest of the rocket. This presents a problem in the way of launch lugs. I've attached the .ork of my design if you need to see it.

    Any solutions? Or will this have to be the second attempt at scaling a soviet missile I've had to scrap? (I started with the Topol ICBM before noticing it had no fins. I can see the conversation that would have made with the RSO now...)
    Ummm... okay...

    Either of these are a NON PROBLEM... just put the lug on a STANDOFF-- a short piece of wood the lug is glued to, which is subsequently glued to the surface of the rocket tube (I usually wrap a piece of 220 grit sandpaper around an equivalent size tube and sand it lightly up and down the length of the tube to make the wood conform to the rocket tube nicely (slightly concave). This will move the lug out from the centerline of the rocket enough to clear any increased size anywhere along the side of the rocket.

    The largest standoff I've used to date is about 1 inch in length, almost like another fin at about the midbody of the rocket, with the lug glued on the end. It was necessary to clear the large round clear globe of the whirlygig toy "nosecone" on my "Warp Drive" night-flying Big Bertha clone. A lower launch lug was glued about midway out on one of the lower fins as well. The main thing is to just ensure both lugs are perfectly aligned with each other and use the same offset from the rocket centerline.

    The other alternative you could use is, sand or cut a notch in the bell-shaped bottom part to clear the rod when the rocket is on the pad. If the bell-shaped part is constructed of balsa or fiberglass, simply sanding or cutting a notch to clear the rod would be easy enough. If the conical part is made of cardstock it's even easier... Such methods are commonly used on large conical shaped rockets like the Russian N-1, the X-24 Bug, the old Quest Lifting Body glider kit, and the old "Vulcan" kit.

    As for prototypes with no fins, again this is no problem... you just have to be creative... you can either simply glue clear fins directly to the body tube, or use insertable fins that are installed below the main body of the rocket on either side of the rocket motor into special tubes added to the motor mount (like many of the Dr. Zooch kits with Flame Fins-- check out Dr. Zooch Rockets website for pics or any of my Dr. Zooch build threads). While Flame fins are made from regular balsa fin stock and paper body tubes, the same thing can easily be done using clear tubes rolled from plastic sheet stock obtained from the hobby shop or online, and clear plastic lexan material, or clear fins glued to short paper tubes that fit into the "fin mounts" in the motor mount much like Flame Fins. There have even been clear plastic fin units sold with some kits, but they're kinda hard to find. One alternative I came up with was an insertable motor mount that simply friction fits inside the missile, extending a couple inches below it, with clear fins glued to that... the missile is then completely unencumbered by any of the fins or anything else for flight that is ugly on display, yet quite well equipped for flight with fins and motor mount in one piece. Do a quick search for my Minuteman III and/or Ares I 1/100 scale rocket build thread in the archives to see either one-- a picture is worth a thousand words!

    Later and good luck! Looks like a REALLY neat project!

    OL JR
    The X-87B Cruise Basselope- THE ultimate weapon in the arsenal of homeland defense and only $52 million per round!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    27th June 2011
    Location
    Florida USA
    Posts
    1,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Quigley View Post
    I think I'll do that. It'll still stick out the tube, though, but it isn't much, and it's not a problem for me. As long as it goes UP, and not LEFT, RIGHT, or if a portal to hell opens up beneath it, DOWN. (Hey, it MIGHT be possible... There's no definitive proof that it can't summon a portal to hell...)

    Thanks!
    You can cut the LL at an angle so its flush with the transition...
    I don't always fly rockets,... But when I do, I get them back. (The most interesting man in the world TV commercial voice)

    Fleet...35
    Estes...6
    scratch-build...29
    Lost...2
    Crashed...5
    Splash-Downs...1
    Most prized...Saturn V
    Total-launched...125(+- 10 or so)
    -My-Rockets-Thread-

  12. #12
    Join Date
    15th June 2011
    Location
    around Denver
    Posts
    460
    sounds a payload just in the back. I built a Comet Chaser in October and to clear the payload section, there are just two small bala strips that you glue side by side so it's the width of the launch lug, and its tall enough that the payload section clears the launch rod. Would something like this work for you?

    http://www.acsupplyco.com/estes/este...met_chaser.htm


    You can see it under the decal that says, " comet chaser"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    20th September 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by [POW]Eagle159 View Post
    You can cut the LL at an angle so its flush with the transition...
    I meant that the launch lug, aligned with the smaller body tube, will not be completely inside the second tube. Thanks anyway!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •