As a fire captain in charge of the local Hazmat team, I get called by FPB (the Fire Prevention Bureau) all the time about issues, so, I have some first-hand experience in how things like this ends up in the codes/regulations/NRS.
It's usually there because someone had a problem. ...And once it's in the codes, it's grandfathered forever until someone squawks and gets it modified.
To place this in perspective, you have to understand that in our area the FPB and local Fire Departments are absolutely paranoid (and justifiably so) about wildland fires. We live in a desert, and over the last two years the fuel load in this area has become truly frightening. You can't even drive off-road legally without water and a shovel. Over the course of this last summer, I responded to a wildland fire every other day, averaging 2 to 20 acres. The only reason they cap at about 20 acres is that we throw lots of resources at each fire, keeping them from getting big enough to swallow subdivisions.
FPB wants to help reduce this drain on strained county/city budgets, so they look at reducing the ignition sources.
For example, FPB came to me this summer because they were finding the remains of exploding targets at the head of a lot of fires. The manufacturer claims they're fire safe, so I tested some in the lab, and sure enough, they are not an ignition source if used as specified on the label.
However, they are much more ....entertaining... if you add extra material, such as easily burnable powderized fuels, thus creating a nice fireball. This
is an ignition source.
So FPB has a choice:
- add exploding targets to the prohibited items list
- add wordy language about "modified non factory exploding targets" to the prohibited list
- add nothing and absorb the cost of the fires
Soooo...because of some folks that
"I saw this on YouTube" , and
"Hold my beer and watch this!", option #1 will probabally be implemented and we'll be stuck with this forever. (As an aside, when they asked for my opinion, I suggested #2). So that's how it gets in the codes.
******************
So, now for the interpretation part.
As an example, at Lake Tahoe, starting about 20 years ago we had a large increase in folks that became quadrapalegics/parapalegics after they dove from rocks on the shoreline. They'd hit their heads on submerged rocks or logs.
There was a big media campaign that really didn't produce a decrease in the accidents, so the County passed a law that banned diving from county-owned beaches and shoreline, such as parks. This
did produce results and now we rarely have these accidents.
Unfortunately, last year some friends of mine were issued a citation by a Deputy with a sharp pencil. They were <deep breath> scuba diving. They fought it in court, and the judge dismissed the charges, but the law is still there, and almost insurmountable to get it changed, and that's with a judge and two attorneys trying.
********************
So, where's that leave us with Douglas County? The path of reasoned moderation as outlined by rdbones may bear some fruit, albiet slowly, and with lots of work. Be prepared to be there for the long haul.
The East Fork (Douglas County) Deputy Fire Chief is a former business partner, I'll give him a call.
And the Lyon County Fire Chief is a good friend, I'll call him and point out all the millions of dollars that come into their county from BALLS and Aeropac.
Cheers!
All the best, James