Some sources are suggesting that the SR-72 already exists.
https://www.businessinsider.com/sr-72-lockheed-martin-hinted-may-already-exist-2018-1
https://www.businessinsider.com/sr-72-lockheed-martin-hinted-may-already-exist-2018-1
Good lord, how long did it take to print that?
It's printed in two pieces, and each was 10-12 hours IIRC.
Not as bad as I thought. Thats a good-sized piece with what looks like a lot of material.
You really need to visit the Space Modeling group on Facebook. Then youd see stuff like this that crazy people like Mario Perdue have printed...View attachment 336978
Sent from my iPhone using Rocketry Forum
You really need to visit the Space Modeling group on Facebook. Then you’d see stuff like this that crazy people like Mario Perdue have printed...View attachment 336978
Sent from my iPhone using Rocketry Forum
The intakes for the engines clearly don't represent functional engines at high altitude/high speed as the adjustable cones do on the SR-71.
If this is an accurate representation of the actual jet, there is a new engine out there we need to find out about.
And I don't think we've developed anything that can take off at sea level and function without modifying air flow and burn at 90,000'.
But...I could be wrong. It wouldn't be the first time. While my brother works at Boeing, he's stuck in the commercial airliner engineering section.
He doesn't see any military or X models of anything.
But seams like something like this there would be rumors about in the industry...somewhere.
If this is an accurate representation of the actual jet, there is a new engine out there we need to find out about.
Enter your email address to join: