-
17th December 2017, 06:15 AM
#1
High Performance Pyrotechnics
I've used 4F black powder for all my time in this hobby, but I'm working with a team on a high altitude rocket, and we're looking into a pyrotechnic gas-generator feeding a pneumatic piston for a deployment system, similar to Derek Deville's excellent Qu8k.
Cleaning out the piston after every firing is a drag, and as an engineering student I'm inclined to assume that we can spend money and find an aerospace grade (overpriced and overperforming) solution to the problem. We do have an LEUP, so we can consider a wide range of materials.
We're looking at Black Powder as a baseline material, but we're also considering nitrocellulose. We've eliminated sodium azide (too toxic), and APCP (thermal issues).
Has anyone used anything other than black powder? Does anyone have any advice to share on the subject?
Ad Astra per Aspera
2016 Ns: 3525 (69% L)
2017 Ns: 36984 (90% O)
L3: "Artemis" 7,640 ft, MDRA, January 15, 2017
-
17th December 2017, 06:55 AM
#2
How do you feel about co2 systems? Check out cd3 & peregrine for powder activated, or life vest/raft inflators for mechanically activated.
Check out Swiss Null B (0b) powder, it's even finer than 4fg. I don't think anyone still has stock of 5fg since Goex quit bottling it.
Investigate 7fa or Meal XF powder. It's got more surface area per flake and isn't graphite polished, but I believe more susceptible to static and moisture.
My current theory is that a thin layer of double base pistol tucked under a strata of meal xf in a lamp nipple would be an extremely fast and clean burn for a fantastic electronics bay support.
Nobody that I know of has tried any of this; if you don't have an experienced firearms reloader to go with your LEUP you shouldn't try this.
-
17th December 2017, 06:57 AM
#3
Oh, dirty piston. Duplex loads of smokeless pistol under black powder substitutes is where I'd take a look.
Also airbag pellets, not all of them are azide based.
-
17th December 2017, 02:12 PM
#4
I looked at gun cotton years ago, which is just nitrocellulose that looks just like cotton. It burns very fast and very clean. Unfortunately it’s affected by humidity over time and breaks down into something that was much less useful. It works well because it exposes so much surface area. Nitrocellulose powder might not work so well. Smokeless powder requires containment and when contained delivers very high pressures in a very short time, much higher than our amateur rocketry components can withstand.
I’ve considered CO2 Systems and I’ve read about spring systems. I keep coming back to 4g black powder. Jim Jarvis had some recent posts on achieving more complete combustion that remove concerns about high altitude use of BP for me.
Almost all of my rockets have used pistons. I have never had a problem simply wiping out the “cylinder”. I have brushes up to three inches and my hand with a rag works above that.
Steve Shannon
Steve Shannon
L3CC, TAP, Director, Tripoli Rocketry Association
-
17th December 2017, 06:46 PM
#5
Doesn't AP burn clean (no ash)?
-
17th December 2017, 07:44 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by jderimig
Doesn't AP burn clean (no ash)?
Yes, but they mentioned thermal issues there.
-
17th December 2017, 07:48 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by jderimig
Doesn't AP burn clean (no ash)?
One byproduct is hydrochloric acid.
Steve Shannon
Steve Shannon
L3CC, TAP, Director, Tripoli Rocketry Association
-
17th December 2017, 08:13 PM
#8
-
17th December 2017, 10:26 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by Steve Shannon
One byproduct is hydrochloric acid.
Steve Shannon
Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. HCl acid might not be kind to the hardware and harnesses. Judging by the "heat blast" of a few pounds of APCP chips, bits and powder on the burn pile from 100 feet away after a group motor "machining" session,
I'd say the thermal effects could lead to the flaming parachute recovery. Or a flaming rocket recovery if a cardboard rocker were tried! Kurt
-
17th December 2017, 10:54 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by BlazingAngel665
I've used 4F black powder for all my time in this hobby, but I'm working with a team on a high altitude rocket, and we're looking into a pyrotechnic gas-generator feeding a pneumatic piston for a deployment system, similar to Derek Deville's excellent Qu8k.
Cleaning out the piston after every firing is a drag, and as an engineering student I'm inclined to assume that we can spend money and find an aerospace grade (overpriced and overperforming) solution to the problem. We do have an LEUP, so we can consider a wide range of materials.
We're looking at Black Powder as a baseline material, but we're also considering nitrocellulose. We've eliminated sodium azide (too toxic), and APCP (thermal issues).
Has anyone used anything other than black powder? Does anyone have any advice to share on the subject?
Why even use pyrotechnics 
TP
-
18th December 2017, 02:13 AM
#11
 Originally Posted by rocket_troy
Looks cool! But large, and maybe expensive.
From the Ether...
-
18th December 2017, 02:30 AM
#12
 Originally Posted by dixontj93060
Looks cool! But large, and maybe expensive.
From the Ether...
Yeah, probably not totally ideal for high altitude attempts where you want to optimise everything. Saying that, I have used it in airframes up to 4.5" diam which provides a modest intrusion to the available volume and mass.
TP
Similar Threads
-
By littlemisterbig in forum High Power Rocketry (HPR)
Replies: 10
Last Post: 8th March 2017, 04:35 AM
-
By CCotner in forum High Power Rocketry (HPR)
Replies: 23
Last Post: 5th June 2014, 07:38 PM
-
By Rocket boy in forum Competition Rocketry
Replies: 4
Last Post: 17th January 2014, 12:32 AM
-
By stardust in forum The Watering Hole
Replies: 8
Last Post: 15th May 2012, 05:54 PM
-
By andysrockets in forum High Power Rocketry (HPR)
Replies: 16
Last Post: 12th April 2005, 03:28 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
| |
|