- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 4,497
- Reaction score
- 2,974
There was a thread about X-1 rockets and rocket glider kits or the lack there-of. That got me looking at what I had done in the past, with X-1's.
I've done a simple X-1 with just a side profile and wing, it flew well, but was a bit heavy for the wing and it had a bit of flex. I also did an X-1A with a small nose mounted tractor with an airstartable 24mm motor mount in the tail.
I decided I'd do an X-1E, it has the nicest lines of all of the X-1 variants in my eyes. It also seems to have the stubbiest wings, but with a slightly wider chord.
It had: A re-profiled super-thin wing (⅜ inches at the root), based on the X-3 Stiletto wing profile, enabling the X-1E to reach Mach 2.
A 'knife-edge' windscreen replaced the original greenhouse glazing, an upward-opening canopy replaced the fuselage side hatch and allowed the inclusion of an ejection seat. It reached a maximum speed of mach 2.24 with Joe Walker at the controls. It was rebuilt from the second X-1 original aircraft 46063.
I simply upscaled a nice 3-view I had to 37" long and about 26" wingspan or so. Due to the profile top view the CG for boost has to be about 3/4" back from the leading edge of the wing where it hits the fuse based on a 33% mac point using the top view and wings as a complex wing planform. I did some glide tests at that setting with a 10% nose up attitude and it arced over which normally means it will be stable on boost. I did move it forward about 3/16" just to be safe and this proved to be very good.
I chose to put the ailerons inboard where the real flaps are, and leave the ailerons as just decorative. The tail is fully movable just because that is easy for me to install on a light structure. I set it up using a single 3.7V 450mah lipo and spektrum rx with three hs-55 servos. AUW is just over 12 oz, mostly due to the 4 oz of nose weight to get the CG right. Wing loading is still under 7 oz/sq foot.
2 flight tests this morning in about 10 mph wind gusts proved uneventful. I had chosen a hair too much glide up trim on the first flight, and reduced it for the second. Really nicely behaved, roll and pitch at slow speed were very responsive, but not overly so on boost.
I'll try to get a video tomorrow.
Frank
I've done a simple X-1 with just a side profile and wing, it flew well, but was a bit heavy for the wing and it had a bit of flex. I also did an X-1A with a small nose mounted tractor with an airstartable 24mm motor mount in the tail.
I decided I'd do an X-1E, it has the nicest lines of all of the X-1 variants in my eyes. It also seems to have the stubbiest wings, but with a slightly wider chord.
It had: A re-profiled super-thin wing (⅜ inches at the root), based on the X-3 Stiletto wing profile, enabling the X-1E to reach Mach 2.
A 'knife-edge' windscreen replaced the original greenhouse glazing, an upward-opening canopy replaced the fuselage side hatch and allowed the inclusion of an ejection seat. It reached a maximum speed of mach 2.24 with Joe Walker at the controls. It was rebuilt from the second X-1 original aircraft 46063.
I simply upscaled a nice 3-view I had to 37" long and about 26" wingspan or so. Due to the profile top view the CG for boost has to be about 3/4" back from the leading edge of the wing where it hits the fuse based on a 33% mac point using the top view and wings as a complex wing planform. I did some glide tests at that setting with a 10% nose up attitude and it arced over which normally means it will be stable on boost. I did move it forward about 3/16" just to be safe and this proved to be very good.
I chose to put the ailerons inboard where the real flaps are, and leave the ailerons as just decorative. The tail is fully movable just because that is easy for me to install on a light structure. I set it up using a single 3.7V 450mah lipo and spektrum rx with three hs-55 servos. AUW is just over 12 oz, mostly due to the 4 oz of nose weight to get the CG right. Wing loading is still under 7 oz/sq foot.
2 flight tests this morning in about 10 mph wind gusts proved uneventful. I had chosen a hair too much glide up trim on the first flight, and reduced it for the second. Really nicely behaved, roll and pitch at slow speed were very responsive, but not overly so on boost.
I'll try to get a video tomorrow.
Frank
Last edited: