Reducing the collateral damage from tactical nuclear weapons

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,560
Reaction score
1,748
Thereby making their first use more credible to an adversary with, for instance, deep underground facilities.

The B61-12 will use the 300 ton to 50 kiloton field-variable yield ("dial-a-yield") warhead from the B61-4 gravity bomb but add the guidance unit tail kit to increase the accuracy and boost the target kill capability to one similar to the 360-kiloton strategic B61-7 bomb.

b61-12.jpg


[video=youtube;pTNLThcV9K4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTNLThcV9K4[/video]

EDIT: According to the U.S. Air Force, “the B61 is in the process of a life-extension program, which includes upgrading aging components and a new tail kit assembly. When the program is completed, the B61-12 will replace four different B61 variants in the inventory.” The FAS in this interesting PDF FAQ claims we'll have about 400 of them when the program is completed. That should be enough. :) I suspect the F35 could be one of the delivery vehicles.

https://fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/publications1/Brief2013_B61-12.pdf
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting, very interesting. I hope we never have to use them, but I hope Tehran sees this video.
 
I really wonder when they will pop a few off? Modify the test ban treaties. Think of it this way- you have extremely powerful weapons that have not been tested in a very long time. How do the systems hold up over time? Does age of the systems cause issues? There is theory, then there is proof of theory.

I am not proposing hog wild testing of a mess of bombs, but possibly a few to verify theory.
 
Back
Top