ThirstyBarbarian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
- Messages
- 12,249
- Reaction score
- 7,482
<sigh> - this is exactly what CI and I are talking about. This is the Food Babe's tactic (if you don't know who she is, you can google her, but in this case I think ignorance is bliss) - if it has a chemical name, it has to be bad for you. This is not the case, and natural is not better in every case. Trust me, our cells can not tell the difference between a molecule that is man-made and an identical one purified from "natural" sources. A great example of this is vanillin. This is the primary flavor compound of vanilla, and is what is in artificial vanilla. It is made from a chemical process rather than extracted from vanilla beans. The molecule is the same - our cells cannot tell them apart. Does real vanilla taste better than artificial vanilla? Of course - because there are other flavor components that add to the complexity and enhance the flavor. But vanillin is not harmful to you just because it was made from coal tar.
As I said before, some people do have a sensitivity to MSG. But there are also a lot of people who think they do that are simply suffering from the placebo effect - when they know it's in there, they have symptoms. For what it is worth, MSG is a flavor enhancer - it doesn't add flavor so much as make the other flavors taste bolder. Salt does the same thing, but MSG doesn't make the food taste saltier. That's'so why MSG is in so many snack foods - it just makes them taste better. This is why there is salt in sweet foods like chocolate cake - believe it or not, up to a certain point, salt will actually make the chocolate/sugar combination taste sweeter. I have done this in the lab - it does work.
Bottom line here is that no chemical is being added to your food "just because" or for some nefarious purpose. Everything that is there has a reason for being there, whether as an anti-caking ingredient (keeps the powder from balling up and clogging the system, and from settling in the package into a solid lump), and a preservative, food coloring, or whatever. If there wasn't a good reason for something being there, it wouldn't be - more ingredients just drives up the cost of the ingredients and hurts profits. So no company is going to be adding any more of anything than they need to.
Don't just buy into Internet hype - and don't mistake cause and effect. Just because you ate that McDonalds hamburger two hours ago then got sick doesn't mean it was the "chemical laden" hamburger that did it. And remember that, a lot of the time, if someone is trying to tell you that something is bad for you, it's because they have some sort of alternative to sell you.
Vanillin is a bad example. The source for the vanillin added to your food may be an artificial manufacturing process, but vanillin itself is a naturally occurring chemical that is present in foods that humans have eaten for thousands of years. I would make a distinction between manufactured chemicals that also occur naturally in food and artificial chemicals that do not occur naturally in food and have only been consumed in large quantities for a few decades. If humans have eaten it for a thousand generations, then we probably know if it is safe or not, even if we now manufacture the chemical instead of surce it naturally. If it is something we've only invented in the past few generations, we don't really know for sure yet how it may be affecting us.
I agree that none of the chemical ingredients added to our food are added "just because" or for nefarious purposes. But they aren't added for nutrition. They are added because they make for a more profitable product.
Sometimes, they make food taste better. But that doesn't mean the better tasting product is necessarily good for you.
Sometimes they are added to make the product have a better texture. But that doesn't mean that the product with the more pleasing texture is good for you. In fact, there is some research to suggest that certain emulsifiers are altering our gut biome and are making the protective lining of our guts more permeable to gut bacteria. The emulsifier itself may be non-toxic, but that doesn't mean it's not having a bad effect on our health.
Some chemicals are added to enhance shelf life. But that doesn't mean the longer lasting product is necessarily good for you. It could be that food is something that should be eaten fresh, and things that are prone to spoiling are better for you than things that can sit on a shelf for years and not go bad.
Anyway. I'm not a fanatic about this stuff, and I eat plenty of artificial crap. My point is that just because an artificial ingredient is added to food for a reason, does not mean that the reason is to benefit the health of the consumer. Sometimes it's just done to make money, and the manufacturer couldn't care less if it will kill you as long as you'll buy it.