Well, I'm surprised they are going for a turnaround to launch from 39A just 9 days after Friday's launch. Record was 13 days (almost 14) at LC-40, last month one was 14 days and some hours at Pad 39A.
Apparently the pad and the TEL that transports the Falcon from the hangar to the pad, are in pretty good shape and do not require much time to be ready for use again (The TEL in particular since it needs to be ready to have the Falcon loaded onto it probably by Wednesday to mount the Falcon onto it. Static Test firing is set for Thursday, 2 days away.
But of course before the Bulgariasat launch, there were some unexplained delays before doing the static firing two days late, which delayed the intended launch date by two days, then a weather delay, and then a payload shroud valve problem that caused a delay to Friday. The latter issues were "stuff happens". It's the unexplained 2 day delays that pushed back the static firing that leave me really wondering about this plan to do a super fast turnaround shaving 4 days off the 14 day record for 39A. So, we'll see.
Of course if they end up not being able to do it that fast and push it by 2 days they'll still set a record. And many people would be happy that it would launch on July 4th. Except for all the employees, personnel, reporters, etc. that would have to work on the 4th.
No, Spaceflight Now is a pretty good site for space news.
SpaceX does not exactly let reporters run around inside the hangar and take photos for every vehicle they launch (Indeed, I don't know that they have ever allowed it for any F9 launch). That photo was credited SpaceX. Do you know for a fact that SpaceX has released a hangar photo of the legless Falcon that is about to be flown?
I figure the reporter had no nice pretty close up picture like that of a legless Falcon horizontal, so went with that one (only photos I can recall of recent legless Falcons were pad photos, not KSC hangar photos). It was (to me) intended more as "eye candy" than a technical instructional image, the key thing was the written story which is definitely not a "lazy story"
It was listed as "a Falcon", not the one that is launching. I sure have no problem with it. If I was a reporter with the same limited choice of photos, I'd probably have done the same thing.
Ironically, one of the commenters on that story page wrote this, about that photograph.
Love that photo, are there any larger ones, so i can have it as my screen background