PDA

View Full Version : Another fin alignment jig thread.



Micromeister
7th February 2011, 05:14 PM
Aligning fins for micro competition models is where these particular fin alignment jigs came into being a couple years back, Never really thought too much about it until I saw another thread here on TRF recently. I'm sure I must have seen something similar somewhere in the past as I assumed this type fin jig was a common use item for most serious competition flyers and have had fine success using it on sport flying micros as well.

The Prototype was made from 1/4" transparent acrylic plastic I had laying around the rocket dungon with a couple 2" x 2" x 1/8" aluminum angle legs and some 4-40" hardware. In the beginning it had a 1/8" aluminum retainer strap squeeze bar which was quickly replaced with a 1/4" bar when I noticed i'd bent up the thinner strip during the first couple uses on micro PD models.
These Jigs works well with models from T2 (.246") diameter tubing to BT-55 (1.325"). I've never really tried anything larger as I'd think the body length and internal mandel weight might be an issue?

I've used the prototype jig on micro T2+ to BT-20 for compeitition style models with standard craft body tubes and double taper paper transitions models with great success to get no spin models with a simple internal mandel to keep the paper models from deforming in the straps.
My recently finished all aluminum model is 2 inches longer with an 8" v-groved holding section and 2-1/2" fin deck. The longer length helps making longer body models a bit easier to control.

While spring clips can be used to hold fins in place on the fin deck i've found them totally unnecessary with all but the largest overhanging fins.

If you have any type of saw that can be set up to cut a 45° angle, making these fixtures is a fairly simple chore. Wood would not be my choice as warping and moisture content unevenness would be a constant concern. Phenolic barrier board might be OK for larger models or fin jig construction?

While this jig doesn't work for models with far forward fins or long fin strakes it does well with most multi fin set models by working from the rear fins forward, sliding the body aft as you go.

Leather straps were chosen over other type fastings so the body could be held firmly as yet still allow it to be turned without releasing the pressure to align the next fin. The Deer hide I used could easily be replaced with any soft leather one might have laying around.

Below are a couple pics of the prototype & all Alum. micro Fin Alignment jig. I've had fun with this tool, I believe it would be a useful addition to the most any micro building bench.

rockets4kids
7th February 2011, 05:52 PM
Clever!

It took me a few seconds to realize you use a shim the same thickness of your fins between the beveled plates.

Do you have a jig to maintain 90/120 degree fin spacing, or do you just eye-ball this from lines drawn on the body tube?

Micromeister
7th February 2011, 06:46 PM
Clever!

It took me a few seconds to realize you use a shim the same thickness of your fins between the beveled plates.

Do you have a jig to maintain 90/120 degree fin spacing, or do you just eye-ball this from lines drawn on the body tube?


Thanks:
Humm guess I should have mentioned the addition of the fin thickness shims to make everything workout correctly LOL! Sometimes we just overlook things, sorry!

I use marking templates to mark the fin positions then extend the lines against and on glass plates to ensure they are straight as in the pics below.

Over time I've come to realize a degree or two off those 90/120 degree postions makes very little difference in performance where even the slightest misalignment vertically can greatly reduce achieved altitude due to spin.

rockets4kids
7th February 2011, 07:22 PM
Over time I've come to realize a degree or two off those 90/120 degree postions makes very little difference in performance where even the slightest misalignment vertically can greatly reduce achieved altitude due to spin.

I have noticed the same thing and assumed the results. I am surprised to see so little reference given to this in general model-building tips.

Most of my builds use TTW fins and I find that cutting a "true" slit in the BT with an x-acto blade results in less net effort than jigging up a surface mount fin.

Micromeister
8th February 2011, 01:29 PM
I think the lack of referrence is more due to the nature of sport flying then anything.
I've been told be many in the industry that most folks build or buy a sport model, "starter kit" or two and let the hobby drop. It's only us reletively small 5 or 6 thousand hardcore Rocketeers that give much thought to Aerodynamics or actual flight performance, I doubt if I hadn't been looking at flying competition models and Micro competition models particularly, I'd have given fin alignment all that much thought, time or effort either.

Some folks like TTW fins.
I personally don't use the technique on LPR, Competition and Micro models as it usually means a bit more fin material,glues and finishing which equals a little more mass...and MASS is always the enemy with micros and these type models. Every .01g counts:)

GuyNoir
8th February 2011, 05:58 PM
What's up with the extra holes in the Estes fixtures?

:confused:

gdiscenza
8th February 2011, 06:13 PM
I'm guessing to hang them on the wall.

G.D.

Micromeister
8th February 2011, 08:45 PM
What's up with the extra holes in the Estes fixtures?

:confused:

G.D. is correct: these marking fixtures are hung on pegs for easy access.

I'll add a couple more pics just for fun:
One more in use photo.